[Answered] What are the differences between cache databases and SQL Server?

Answer

Differences between cache databases (such as Redis or Memcached) and relational database management systems (RDBMS) like SQL Server revolve around their design purposes, data storage models, and typical use cases.

1. Purpose and Design: Cache databases are designed for high-speed data retrieval scenarios. They typically store data in-memory and are used to reduce the load on more traditional databases by caching frequently accessed data. SQL Server, on the other hand, is a fully featured RDBMS designed for storing, retrieving, and managing structured data securely and reliably over the long term.

2. Data Storage Model:

Cache Databases: Use simple key-value stores or slightly more complex data structures (lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes). They are optimized for fast read and write operations.

SET user:1000 '{"name":"John", "age":30}'
GET user:1000

SQL Server: Uses a structured query language (SQL) to manage data stored in tables with rows and columns. Supports complex queries, transactions, and relationships between different data entities.

CREATE TABLE Users(
    UserID int,
    Name varchar(255),
    Age int
);
INSERT INTO Users VALUES (1, 'John', 30);
SELECT * FROM Users WHERE UserID = 1;

3. Use Cases:

Cache Databases: Ideal for session stores, page caching, quick retrieval of non-persistent data, or temporary data storage to alleviate load from primary databases.
SQL Server: Suited for applications requiring complex transactions, data integrity, and relationships between data entities. Examples include financial systems, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and any application needing reliable data storage and complex querying capabilities.

4. Scalability:

Cache Databases: Can be scaled out easily by adding more nodes to handle increased load, especially for read-heavy workloads.
SQL Server: Scaling can involve vertical scaling (upgrading existing hardware) or horizontal scaling (adding more servers or using techniques like sharding), which can be more complex to manage.

5. Persistence:

While some cache databases offer mechanisms to persist data to disk, they are primarily designed for volatile storage. SQL Server, in contrast, is built for persistent storage, ensuring data durability through mechanisms like logging and checkpoints.

In summary, the choice between a cache database and SQL Server depends on specific application needs. Cache databases excel at providing high-speed access to temporary or frequently-read data, improving performance for critical applications. SQL Server is better suited for applications requiring complex data manipulation, transactions, and long-term data persistence.