Question: What is the difference between distributed cache and local cache?
Answer
When understanding caching, it's key to distinguish between distributed cache and local cache. Each method has its advantages and potential downsides, and the best choice depends on your application’s scalability needs, data consistency requirements, and available system resources.
Local Cache
Local cache refers to a cache that resides in the same JVM (Java Virtual Machine) or process as your application. This is sometimes known as an "in-memory" cache because the cached data is stored in the main memory of the server running the application.
The primary advantage of local caching is speed. Since the cache is in the same memory space as your application, accessing this data is extremely fast. Another benefit is simplicity; such systems are easier to implement and manage because they do not require network configuration or additional dependencies.
However, local caches have limitations:
- Scalability: A local cache can only scale as far as the resources of the machine it runs on. If your application grows beyond those resources, you'll need to add more machines, at which point a local cache becomes less useful.
- Data Inconsistency: When you run multiple instances of your application, each with its own local cache, you may encounter data inconsistency issues.
# Example: Using Python's built-in dictionary as a simple local cache cache = {} def get_data(key): if key in cache: return cache[key] # otherwise fetch the data from a database or another source
Distributed Cache
Distributed cache, on the other hand, is a cache shared over multiple nodes/servers. It provides a solution to both the scalability problem and the data inconsistency issue intrinsic to local caches.
A distributed cache can handle much larger data volumes because it spreads data across multiple nodes. It also maintains data consistency across different instances of your application by ensuring that all instances refer to the same cache.
However, distributed caches are generally slower than local caches because they often require network calls to retrieve data. They're also more complex to set up and manage due to the networking requirements
# Example: Using Redis as a distributed cache in Python import redis r = redis.Redis(host='localhost', port=6379, db=0) def get_data(key): if r.exists(key): return r.get(key) # otherwise fetch the data from a database or another source
These examples give a basic understanding of how local and distributed caches work. The right type of cache for your use case will depend on your specific needs and constraints.
Was this content helpful?
Other Common In Memory Questions (and Answers)
- What is a Distributed Cache and How Can It Be Implemented?
- How do you design a distributed cache system?
- What is a persistent object cache and how can one implement it?
- How can I set up and use Redis as a distributed cache?
- Why should you use a persistent object cache?
- What are the differences between an in-memory cache and a distributed cache?
- What is AWS's In-Memory Data Store Service and how can it be used effectively?
- What is a distributed cache in AWS and how can it be implemented?
- How can you implement Azure distributed cache in your application?
- What is the best distributed cache system?
- Is Redis a distributed cache?
- What is the difference between a replicated cache and a distributed cache?
Free System Design on AWS E-Book
Download this early release of O'Reilly's latest cloud infrastructure e-book: System Design on AWS.
Switch & save up to 80%
Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost