Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

cache.m5.xlarge (Amazon ElastiCache Instance Overview)

Instance Details

vCPUMemoryNetwork PerformanceInstance FamilyInstance Generation
412.93 GiBUp to 10 GigabitStandardCurrent

Pricing Analysis

Filters

RegionON DEMAND1 Year Reserved (All Upfront)
US West (Oregon)$0.311$0.199
US East (N. Virginia)$0.311$0.199

cache.m5.xlarge Related Instances

Instance NamevCPUMemory
cache.m5.large26.38 GiB
cache.m5.xlarge412.93 GiB
cache.m5.2xlarge826.04 GiB
cache.m5.4xlarge1652.26 GiB

Use Cases for cache.m5.xlarge

Primary Use Cases

  • Session Storage: ElastiCache is commonly used to store session information for web applications, and m5 instances perform exceptionally well in environments with steady session traffic.
  • Distributed In-Memory Caching: Applications that rely heavily on caching, such as content management systems (CMS), benefit from the well-rounded features of the m5 series to deliver low-latency responses.
  • Database-Backed Applications: Applications that frequently perform read-heavy operations benefit from the m5 instance’s ability to handle caching of database query results efficiently, speeding up application performance significantly.

When to Use cache.m5.xlarge

  • Medium-Scale Caching: If your application has grown beyond entry-level instances and now requires more stable compute and memory resources but does not necessitate compute- or memory-optimized instances, cache.m5.xlarge provides an ideal balance.
  • Consistent Traffic Patterns: Ideal for systems where workloads are relatively uniform throughout the day, combining steady network utilization with balanced computational and memory requirements.
  • Multi-Tier Applications: For applications that have multiple layers (e.g., web servers, application servers, and database layers), m5.xlarge offers sufficient power to cache frequently accessed data, reducing overall database hits.
  • Cost Optimization with Efficient Performance: This instance is optimal when cost considerations are critical, but you still require consistent performance for general-use case workloads that scale moderately.

When Not to Use cache.m5.xlarge

  • Compute-Centric Workloads: If your workload is centered around high CPU requirements, such as big data processing or complex query analyses, look at the compute-optimized c-series (e.g., cache.c5.xlarge).
  • Memory-Intensive or Larger-Scale Needs: When the application predominantly requires high memory availability, or if you’re working with large datasets, the r-series (e.g., cache.r5.xlarge) might be more efficient.
  • Highly Variable, Low-Performance Workloads: For highly variable workloads with intermittent spikes but low constant activity, the burstable performance instances (e.g., cache.t3.large) may provide significant cost savings during idle periods.

Understanding the m5 Series

Overview of the Series

The M5 series consists of general-purpose ElastiCache instances designed to deliver a balanced mix of compute, memory, and networking resources. It is optimized to support a wide range of applications and workload types. The m5 series serves as a solid choice for both caching and session storage applications, offering consistent performance across workloads that require a well-rounded resource allocation without extreme specialization.

Key Improvements Over Previous Generations

Compared to the previous generation (M4 series), M5 instances provide:

  • Better Network Performance: Elastic Network Adapter (ENA) gives instances higher and more consistent network bandwidth, with enhanced packet parlance.
  • Next-Generation Hypervisors: M5 instances operate on the Nitro System, providing better isolation, improved security, and more consistent performance.
  • Improved Compute: Powered by Intel Xeon Scalable processors (up to 3.1 GHz), the M5 instance family delivers higher performance for compute-heavy tasks.
  • Increased Efficiency: The m5 series provides higher throughput and lower latency, delivering cost savings and greater performance compared to older architectures at the same price point.

Comparative Analysis

  • Primary Comparison:
    The m5 series is an evolutionary step from the m4 series. The crucial upgrade lies in the shift from older network adapters on m4 to enhanced network adapters on m5, ensuring more consistent network performance. Also, while the m4 instances are still useful, m5 provides better compute performance and memory bandwidth. When comparing across instance sizes (e.g., m5.large vs. m5.xlarge), the xlarge configuration offers double the resources for compute, memory, and network throughput, making it better suited for medium-sized caching workloads.

  • Brief Comparison with Relevant Series:

    • General Purpose (M-Series): M-series instances, like the m5 family, balance computing, memory, and networking. If you require versatility and standard performance for general workloads, m-series is often the right choice.
    • Compute Optimized (C-Series): If you've got compute-heavy workloads like real-time analytics or high-performance web applications, the c-series (compute-optimized instances) will offer better raw processing power.
    • Burstable Performance (T-Series): For cost-conscious workloads with low-to-medium processing needs that experience occasional spikes, the T-series might be more suited. They are more cost-efficient for highly variable workloads.
    • High-Performance Networking: If your workload depends heavily on I/O performance with extremely high network bandwidth needs, consider instances designed for higher networking throughput, like the r- and i-series, which specialize in memory-bound or high-I/O workloads.

Migration and Compatibility

When migrating from older M-series instances (e.g., from m3 or m4 to m5), you can benefit from the improved network and memory performance of m5 without needing broad architecture changes. The transition should be fairly linear as m5 retains the general-purpose characteristics while offering better cost-to-performance ratios. Compatibility with most ElastiCache operations and features will remain constant, though the transition to the Nitro hypervisor and ENA may require slight adaptation depending on your infrastructure.