Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

cache.r3.large (Amazon ElastiCache Instance Overview)

Instance Details

vCPUMemoryNetwork PerformanceInstance FamilyInstance Generation
213.5 GiBModerateMemory optimizedPrevious

Pricing Analysis

Filters

RegionON DEMAND1 Year Reserved (All Upfront)
US West (Oregon)$0.228-
US East (N. Virginia)$0.228-

cache.r3.large Related Instances

Instance NamevCPUMemory
cache.r3.large213.5 GiB
cache.r3.xlarge428.4 GiB
cache.r3.2xlarge858.2 GiB

Use Cases for cache.r3.large

Primary Use Cases

  • In-memory caches for real-time analytics: The cache.r3.large instance is well-suited for use cases where applications need fast access to data held in memory, such as analytics systems performing real-time calculations.
  • Session storage: For applications where frequent user sessions are used, cache.r3.large can store session data in-memory, reducing the time required to retrieve user data.
  • Web content caching: Websites or API endpoints that demand fast response times can use this instance for caching frequently requested data, reducing the pressure on backend databases.

When to Use cache.r3.large

The cache.r3.large instance is best suited for applications that rely heavily on in-memory data processing but don't require the full capacity of larger instances. Ideal use cases include:

  • Medium-sized datasets: If your application has medium-sized memory requirements (15.25 GiB), especially for workloads with frequent reads/writes and consistent in-memory access patterns.
  • High IOPS and low-latency needs: For applications where reducing latency and boosting performance are priorities, particularly in industries like financial services, gaming, and e-commerce, cache.r3.large provides an excellent blend of size and performance.

When Not to Use cache.r3.large

  • CPU-bound workloads: If your application requires more CPU performance than memory, a compute-optimized instance type like cache.c5.large may be a better choice.
  • Cost-constrained scenarios: If your use case has low but unpredictable load patterns, opting for a burstable instance like cache.t3.large could be more economical, though it would offer lower sustained performance.
  • Larger datasets: If your application requires significantly more memory, consider moving to an r5 or r6 instance which offers more memory and better overall performance than the r3 series. For example, cache.r5.large has more memory and higher bandwidth.

Understanding the r3 Series

Overview of the Series

The r3 series is part of AWS's memory-optimized family of ElastiCache instances, designed to provide high-performance caching solutions for applications that demand large amounts of memory and sustained throughput. These instances are optimized for applications that rely on in-memory data processing, and they deliver low-latency access to large datasets. With the r3 series, your workloads benefit from high memory-to-vCPU ratios, making them ideal for memory-intensive workloads such as real-time analytics, large-scale caching, or in-memory databases.

Key Improvements Over Previous Generations

The r3 series brought significant improvements over its predecessors, primarily focusing on memory optimization and network performance. Key advancements include:

  • Enhanced Memory Capacity: The r3.large instance offers 15.25 GiB of memory, which is a large increase from the earlier memory-optimized instances, allowing for more in-memory data storage and faster data processing.
  • Better Network Performance: The r3 series provides enhanced network capabilities to support high-volume data transfer, which is crucial for high-performance caching.
  • Low Latency: With improved networking features, instances in the r3 series are primed to handle latency-sensitive applications where rapid access to data is critical.

Comparative Analysis

Primary Comparison (Within the r3 Series)

Within the r3 series, the size of the instances varies based on memory, vCPUs, and network performance. The cache.r3.large is positioned at the lower end of the r3 instance family but still offers ample memory (15.25 GiB) and two vCPUs, making it ideal for medium-sized workloads. Larger instances such as cache.r3.xlarge (with 30.5 GiB of memory) may be more appropriate for larger datasets or more demanding applications.

Brief Comparison with Relevant Series

  • General-purpose series (m-series): If your workloads require a balance of memory, compute, and network resources, the m-series (e.g., cache.m5.large) might be a better choice. These offer more balanced resource distribution but less memory for the same instance size compared to r3 instances.

  • Compute-optimized series (c-series): For CPU-intensive workloads (e.g., complex computations or heavy data processing), the compute-optimized c-series (e.g., cache.c5.large) may be a better fit. However, c-series instances have considerably less memory for the same instance size, and they may not be the best choice for large in-memory caches.

  • Burstable performance series (t-series): If cost efficiency is a key consideration and workloads are low-to-moderate with peaks of high demand, the burstable t-series (e.g., cache.t3.large) could be more suitable. However, these instances offer significantly lower sustained performance compared to the r3 series due to their reliance on burst credits.

  • Series with unique features: If high network bandwidth is a factor (e.g., for very large and fast real-time data processing), newer series like r5 or r6g that feature enhanced network bandwidth capabilities may be worth considering.

Migration and Compatibility

Moving to the r3 series from older instance types should generally be straightforward. If you're upgrading from prior memory-optimized instances (such as the r2 series), you’ll benefit from larger memory, better EBS I/O performance, and enhanced network bandwidth.

While migrating, ensure that your current application's memory requirements can effectively use the additional RAM without exceeding the instance's memory capacity. Compatibility with the underlying cache engine version, such as Redis or Memcached, should be checked in advance to ensure a smooth transition.