Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

cache.m5.12xlarge (Amazon ElastiCache Instance Overview)

Instance Details

vCPUMemoryNetwork PerformanceInstance FamilyInstance Generation
48157.12 GiB10 GigabitStandardCurrent

Pricing Analysis

Filters

RegionON DEMAND1 Year Reserved (All Upfront)
US West (Oregon)$3.744$2.385
US East (N. Virginia)$3.744$2.385

cache.m5.12xlarge Related Instances

Instance NamevCPUMemory
cache.m5.2xlarge826.04 GiB
cache.m5.4xlarge1652.26 GiB
cache.m5.12xlarge48157.12 GiB
cache.m5.24xlarge96314.32 GiB

Use Cases for cache.m5.12xlarge

Primary Use Cases

Typical scenarios where cache.m5.12xlarge excels include:

  • Distributed Caching: Ideal for supporting applications with high traffic, such as content delivery networks (CDNs), allowing them to cache content closer to the user without performance degradation.
  • Real-time Analytics: Large-scale analytics processes that want rapid access to frequently queried datasets can take advantage of the balance between compute and memory resources this instance offers.
  • Session Stores: Web applications needing scalable session management can leverage this instance to store session data efficiently.

When to Use cache.m5.12xlarge

The cache.m5.12xlarge instance is optimal when you need a caching solution that requires significant processing power and memory resources, and the application expects consistent performance regardless of load fluctuations. Ideal applications include:

  • Large-scale distributed in-memory caches for serving latency-sensitive websites or applications.
  • Machine learning inference layers, where keeping a large amount of metadata cached is crucial to performance.
  • Transactional data caching, where both the speed of access and the stability of the network layer are vital.

When Not to Use cache.m5.12xlarge

The cache.m5.12xlarge might not be the perfect fit in scenarios where:

  • CPU-intensive workloads are more dominant than memory or network needs. In these cases, lean towards compute-optimized series such as cache.c5.12xlarge.
  • Cost-efficiency is a top priority for very low-intensity caching use cases. If workloads consist mostly of sporadic data access with minimal traffic, a smaller m-series instance or a burstable option like cache.t3.medium might be more economical.
  • Memory-heavy workloads with databases like Redis but requiring large quantities of memory per instance would benefit from r5 instances, which provide greater memory-to-vCPU ratios and higher throughput for memory-intensive tasks.

Understanding the m5 Series

Overview of the Series

The m5 series in Amazon ElastiCache represents the fifth iteration of general-purpose instances that provide a balance of compute, memory, and network resources. These instances are designed to deliver consistent performance across a wide variety of workloads while optimizing cost-efficiency. The m5 family is ideal for workloads that require an even distribution of processing power, memory, and network capacity, making it versatile enough for many use cases such as caching, real-time data analytics, and session storage.

Key Improvements Over Previous Generations

Compared to previous generations like the m4 series, m5 instances come with several improvements:

  1. Processor Architecture: m5 instances are powered by Intel Xeon Platinum 8175 processors, providing better performance per core and improved energy efficiency.
  2. Memory-to-vCPU Ratio: m5 instances have optimized memory allocations compared to earlier generations, which improves memory-bound applications.
  3. Enhanced Networking: These instances offer up to 25 Gbps in networking throughput, significantly improving on the network bandwidth available on previous models.
  4. EBS Optimization: With enhanced EBS performance, m5 instances offer faster response times for disk-intensive applications.

Comparative Analysis

Primary Comparison

The cache.m5.12xlarge instance, belonging to the m5 series, offers 48 vCPUs and 192 GiB of memory. This makes it well-suited for large-scale in-memory cache deployments with a high rate of throughput and the need for horizontal scaling.

  • Compared to cache.m4.10xlarge, the cache.m5.12xlarge delivers better performance per vCPU, at the same time offering more memory and better network bandwidth.
  • Relative to smaller m5 instances (e.g., cache.m5.2xlarge), the 12xlarge variant allows for workloads that demand much larger caching layers, offering a stronger performance profile with far fewer instance deployments.

Brief Comparison with Relevant Series

  • When to Consider m-Series: The m-series (general-purpose) is an excellent default choice when workloads are balanced between CPU, memory, and network needs. These instances provide predictable performance and are versatile. Use the m5 series when your application does not explicitly require compute optimization or memory-heavy demands, but still needs scalable performance, such as Redis or Memcached-based caching.

  • Compute-optimized Series (e.g., c5): If your application’s workload is more compute-intensive and requires high CPU performance, a compute-optimized series like the cache.c5.12xlarge may be more suited. This instance would be preferable for tasks involving complex algorithms and real-time processing of extensive datasets.

  • Burstable Performance Series (e.g., t3): For workloads that only require consistent baseline performance with occasional spikes, the cache.t3.xlarge or t3.medium instances would present more cost-effective options. These instances allow for lower operational costs in exchange for potentially lower sustained performance compared to m5 instances.

  • High Bandwidth Options: If your workload prioritizes network throughput, such as in scenarios requiring large-scale data shuffling or cross-region replication, the cache.r5n series (with its high network bandwidth features) might be a better fit.

Migration and Compatibility

Upgrading to cache.m5.12xlarge from smaller instances within the m5 family or earlier generations (m4, m3) is straightforward. Most applications relying on Redis or Memcached will work seamlessly on the upgraded hardware. Compatibility between different instance families remains intact; however, ensure:

  1. Redis/Memcached version compatibility is verified when moving between generations.
  2. Test your workload under expected traffic before switching in production to ensure the slight architectural differences (especially network optimizations) do not introduce bottlenecks.