cache.r4.8xlarge (Amazon ElastiCache Instance Overview)
Instance Details
vCPU | Memory | Network Performance | Instance Family | Instance Generation |
---|---|---|---|---|
32 | 203.26 GiB | 10 Gigabit | Memory optimized | Current |
Pricing Analysis
Filters
Region | ON DEMAND | 1 Year Reserved (All Upfront) |
---|---|---|
US West (Oregon) | $3.640 | - |
US East (N. Virginia) | $3.640 | - |
cache.r4.8xlarge Related Instances
Instance Name | vCPU | Memory |
---|---|---|
cache.r4.2xlarge | 8 | 50.47 GiB |
cache.r4.4xlarge | 16 | 101.38 GiB |
cache.r4.8xlarge | 32 | 203.26 GiB |
cache.r4.16xlarge | 64 | 407 GiB |
Use Cases for cache.r4.8xlarge
Primary Use Cases
- Enterprise caching solutions: The high memory capacity makes this ideal for caching large datasets, such as API responses, search query results, and product catalogs.
- Real-time analytics platforms: When processing large volumes of data in near real-time, this instance offers the necessary speed and performance to manage the in-memory workloads.
- Session storage: For applications with a massive number of active users, storing sessions in-memory reduces latency, improving overall application response times.
- Machine-learning data preprocessing: Often, large datasets in machine learning applications need to be prepared in-memory before models can be trained efficiently.
When to Use cache.r4.8xlarge
The cache.r4.8xlarge is most appropriate when:
- Large in-memory data sets are needed for high-speed, low-latency interactions.
- Your application requires high throughput with minimal response time and is memory-intensive rather than CPU-constrained.
- Businesses operate API-heavy workloads where caching can reduce response times significantly.
- Heavier in-memory mission-critical applications, such as gaming leaderboards, advertisement platforms, and media rendering systems, demand substantial memory availability to keep processes running smoothly.
When Not to Use cache.r4.8xlarge
Consider alternatives when:
- CPU-bound workloads: If your workload is more CPU-bound, such as high-performance computing tasks, switching to compute-optimized instances like C5 or C6g might offer better performance and reduced costs.
- Moderate memory requirements: For applications that don't require extreme memory capacity, an M5 or M6g general-purpose instance may offer a better balance of memory and CPU, reducing costs.
- Light or bursty workloads: Workloads with inconsistent traffic patterns and unsteady memory usage might benefit from T3 or T4g instances, which are designed to handle bursts while maintaining cost-efficiency.
- Evolving workloads: If your system architecture is transitioning or scaling, and you need access to newer technologies like ARM processors or local NVMe storage, consider moving to r6g or r6gd instances, which may unlock better performance-per-dollar.
Understanding the r4 Series
Overview of the Series
The r4 series within Amazon ElastiCache is an earlier-generation memory-optimized instance type, designed to deliver fast performance for memory-intensive applications. These instances provide high memory capacity relative to CPU and are suitable for applications that require large amounts of in-memory data processing, such as caching, session storage, and real-time analytics. With r4 instances, ElastiCache users benefit from high throughput and low latency while minimizing costs associated with excess CPU utilization.
Key Improvements Over Previous Generations
Compared to its predecessor, the r3 series, the r4 series features several significant improvements, such as:
- Better memory per vCPU ratio: The r4 series has a greater memory footprint relative to CPU resources, enabling workloads to manage larger datasets more efficiently.
- Enhanced network performance: Instances in the r4 family support Enhanced Networking via Elastic Network Adapters (ENA), providing increased packet throughput with lower latency.
- Improved energy efficiency: The use of Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4 processors (Broadwell architecture) offers higher energy efficiency and better real-time performance compared to the older Sandy Bridge-based processors used in some previous models.
Comparative Analysis
-
Primary Comparison:
Within the same family, the cache.r4.8xlarge offers 244.5 GiB of memory and 32 vCPUs, making it ideal for heavier workloads when compared to smaller r4 instances (such as the r4.large or r4.xlarge). These smaller instances are more cost-effective but may not be suitable for large-scale applications that demand high memory capacity and processing power. If finer-grained scaling is required, choosing smaller r4 instance sizes for horizontal scaling may be beneficial. -
Brief Comparison with Relevant Series:
-
General-purpose series (M-series):
For workloads that require a balanced performance between CPU, memory, and networking, an M5 or M6g instance might be more cost-effective. However, these instances offer less memory per vCPU than r4. Use M-series when your app depends on general-purpose agility but may not need the memory optimization provided by r4. -
Compute-optimized series (C-series):
If your workload is CPU-bound rather than memory-bound, consider C5 or C6g instances, especially for computationally heavy tasks like real-time data analytics or large-scale web applications. These have fewer memory resources but higher compute power per dollar. -
Cost-effective burstable series (T-series):
For less demanding or spiky traffic workloads, consider T2 or T3 burstable performance instances. They are highly cost-efficient; however, they may not be suitable for applications that require sustained high-throughput memory access. -
Network bandwidth-focused series:
Series such as r6gd, which feature local NVMe SSD instance storage, should be considered if you need faster networking and storage access, allowing greater agility for cache-heavy transactional data applications and scenarios requiring high bandwidth.
-
Migration and Compatibility
When upgrading from earlier generations such as r3 to r4 instances, the migration is generally straightforward, as both series support the same underlying architectures based on the x86 platform. Ensure that workload characteristics still align with the r4 performance specs, or alternatively, consider newer series like r5 or r6g if the objective is to gain further improvements, such as cost-effectiveness via ARM-based Graviton instances. Compatibility with existing configurations such as security groups, parameter groups, and Redis/Memcached engines remains consistent across these upgrades. Always perform application-level testing to validate performance improvements.