Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

cache.r5.24xlarge (Amazon ElastiCache Instance Overview)

Instance Details

vCPUMemoryNetwork PerformanceInstance FamilyInstance Generation
96635.61 GiB25 GigabitMemory optimizedCurrent

Pricing Analysis

Filters

RegionON DEMAND1 Year Reserved (All Upfront)
US West (Oregon)$10.368-
US East (N. Virginia)$10.368-

cache.r5.24xlarge Related Instances

Instance NamevCPUMemory
cache.r5.4xlarge16105.81 GiB
cache.r5.12xlarge48317.77 GiB
cache.r5.24xlarge96635.61 GiB

Use Cases for cache.r5.24xlarge

Primary Use Cases

The cache.r5.24xlarge instance is an excellent choice for several key use cases:

  • High-Volume Caching: For applications that require very large caches to store frequently-used data, reducing latencies, and speeding up response times.
  • In-Memory Databases: Ideal for running large Redis or Memcached databases where fast, low-latency access to large datasets is mission-critical.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Provides the memory and compute resources necessary for running real-time analytics and identifying insights or trends from large data streams.
  • Session Management: For web applications that require large in-memory session stores for high volumes of concurrent users.

When to Use cache.r5.24xlarge

The r5.24xlarge is particularly suitable when:

  • The workload involves large datasets that need to be fully loaded into memory for quick random access.
  • The need for low-latency, high-throughput operations is critical, such as in caching for high-scale content delivery networks (CDNs) or distributed applications.
  • There is a demand for running large-scale Redis clusters to support high traffic e-commerce platforms, fintech analytics, or AI inference clusters.

When Not to Use cache.r5.24xlarge

This instance type may not be suitable if:

  • Cost Sensitivity: If budget constraints are high, smaller r5 instances may be a better option, or even transitioning to general-purpose nodes in the M-series for workloads that don’t require massive in-memory data stores.
  • CPU-Intensive Workloads: Applications that benefit more from compute power than from memory should use compute-optimized instances like cache.c5.
  • Bursty Workloads: If your workloads are sporadic in nature and can handle temporary performance degradation, burstable instances (cache.t3 or t4g) would be more economical.

In use cases that involve smaller datasets or where memory isn’t the limiting factor, choosing a lower instance size in the r5 family or another more cost-effective series may result in substantial cost savings without impacting performance.

Understanding the r5 Series

Overview of the Series

The r5 series in Amazon ElastiCache is part of the memory-optimized family, designed specifically for applications that require large amounts of memory combined with moderate CPU performance. R5 nodes offer a balance of compute and memory resources and are ideal for memory-intensive applications such as in-memory databases, real-time analytics, and high-performance computing. Key advantages of the r5 series include better price-to-performance ratio, improved scalability, and enhanced network bandwidth compared to older R-series generations.

Key Improvements Over Previous Generations

Compared to the previous r4 generation of instances, the r5 instances offer a variety of upgrades:

  • Enhanced CPU performance with Intel Xeon Scalable processors (Skylake and Cascade Lake) running at higher clock speeds.
  • Larger memory capacity per node, enabling the r5 series to handle even higher data volumes in memory.
  • Higher memory bandwidth to improve throughput for memory-intensive workloads.
  • Improved networking performance, with support for Elastic Network Adapter (ENA) providing better support for high-bandwidth, low-latency applications.
  • More efficient use of resources, delivering better performance at a lower price point per GiB of memory.

Comparative Analysis

Primary Comparison:

Within the r5 series itself, the cache.r5.24xlarge is the largest instance size, offering 768 GiB of memory and 96 vCPUs. Compared to smaller r5 instances, such as the cache.r5.2xlarge or r5.4xlarge, the larger instance size allows for greater in-memory dataset sizes and more client connections. It is better suited to workloads requiring the maximum memory that can be allocated to a single instance, such as large in-memory analytics datasets or caching massive amounts of information for near-instant retrieval.

Brief Comparison with Relevant Series:

  • General-purpose (M-series): When typical workloads require a balance between compute and memory, consider opting for the M-series (e.g., cache.m5). The M-series will be more cost-effective for general-purpose applications that don't rely heavily on memory.

  • Compute-optimized (C-series): For workloads that demand more compute rather than memory, the C-series (e.g., cache.c5) would be a better fit. While the C-series won’t offer the large memory footprint of the r5 instances, they excel in CPU-heavy tasks, such as data processing and dynamic web content rendering.

  • Burstable Performance (T-series): For applications with irregular or unpredictable workloads, where resource usage spikes and drops throughout the day, a cost-effective burstable choice like cache.t3 or cache.t4g may be preferred. These instances offer lower cost with the ability to handle high workloads temporarily using "CPU credits."

  • High Network Bandwidth Series: Specific instance families, such as cache.r5n, offer even higher network performance than the standard r5. These should be considered for workloads that are memory and network-intensive, such as those requiring high throughput in a distributed environment.

Migration and Compatibility

Upgrading from an older series such as r4 or r3 to r5.24xlarge is straightforward, as r5 maintains compatibility with previous features and configurations of the older nodes. Key points to consider for migration:

  • Ensure that the application can leverage the larger memory footprint and higher CPU count.
  • Budget for potential scaling issues related to larger Redis or Memcached environments, such as key distribution across shards or node additional hotspots.
  • It may be beneficial to perform testing in a staging environment to identify any application-level issues related to higher performance or configuration changes.

If you're currently running on an r4.16xlarge node or lower, migrating to r5.24xlarge would give you significant performance and memory improvements while maintaining comparable cost efficiency.