Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

Top 59 NoSQL Databases

Compare & Find the Best NoSQL Database For Your Project.

Database Types:AllIn-MemoryKey-ValueDocumentDistributed
Query Languages:AllNoSQLCustom APIJSONPathREST
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
Redis Logo
RedisHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
In-memory data store, High performance, Flexible data structures, Simple and powerful APILimited durability, Single-threaded structureIn-Memory, Key-Value706.2k67.1k
RethinkDB Logo
  //  
2009
Real-time changes to query results, JSON document storageLimited active development, Not as popular as other NoSQL optionsDocument, Distributed2.8k26.8k
MongoDB Logo
MongoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
Document-oriented, Scalable, Flexible schemaConsistency model, Memory usageDocument, NoSQL2.9m26.4k
PouchDB Logo
  //  
2012
Offline capabilities, Synchronizes with CouchDB, JavaScript basedLimited scalability, Single-node architectureDocument, Embedded16.0k16.9k
ScyllaDB Logo
ScyllaDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2015
Extremely fast, Compatible with Apache Cassandra, Low latencyLimited built-in query language, Requires managing infrastructureDistributed, Wide Column69.4k13.6k
OpenSearch Logo
OpenSearchHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2021
Open source, Scalable, Real-time search and analyticsRelatively new, Less enterprise support compared to ElasticsearchSearch Engine, Distributed99.1k9.8k
Apache Cassandra Logo
Apache CassandraHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2008
High availability, Linear scalability, Fault tolerantComplexity of operation and maintenance, Limited query languageDistributed, Wide Column5.8m8.9k
LiteDB Logo
  //  
2016
Single-file database, Lightweight and fast, No SQL server requiredLimited to C# ecosystem, Not suitable for very large scale applicationsDocument, Embedded3.4k8.6k
Deep Lake Logo
Deep LakeHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2020
Optimized for AI and ML, Efficient data versioningComplexity in integration, Niche domain focusMachine Learning, Vector DBMS28.9k8.2k
LokiJS Logo
  //  
2014
In-memory database, Lightweight, FastLimited scalability, No built-in persistenceIn-Memory06.8k
IBM Cloudant Logo
IBM CloudantHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2014
Highly scalable, Managed cloud service, Fully integrated with IBM CloudLimited offline support, Smaller ecosystem compared to other NoSQL databasesDocument, Distributed13.4m6.3k
BigchainDB Logo
  //  
2017
High throughput, Decentralized and immutable, Focus on blockchain technologyLimited querying capabilities, Not suitable for high-frequency updatesBlockchain, Distributed1.2k4.0k
YDB Logo
YDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2021
High scalability, Fault-tolerantRelatively new, Limited community supportDistributed, Relational6.7k4.0k
Tarantool Logo
  //  
2010
In-memory performance, Flexible data modelLimited ecosystem, Complex configurationIn-Memory, Distributed4.3k3.4k
Skytable Logo
  //  
2021
High performance, Scalable, Multi-modelRelatively new, Limited communityKey-Value, Distributed, In-Memory12.4k
GeoMesa Logo
  //  
2013
Scalable geospatial processing, Integrates with big data tools, Handles spatial and spatiotemporal dataComplex setup, Limited support for certain geospatial queriesGeospatial, Distributed5801.4k
Infinispan Logo
InfinispanHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
Highly scalable, Rich data structures, Supports in-memory cachingComplex configuration, Requires Java environment, Can be resource-intensiveIn-Memory, Distributed2.4k1.2k
Tigris Logo
TigrisHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2022
Scalable, Multi-tenancy, Easy to use APIsRelatively new, Limited community supportDocument, Relational7.1k921
Kyoto Tycoon Logo
  //  
2011
Lightweight, Fast key-value storageLimited query capabilities, Not natively distributedIn-Memory, Key-Value1.7k276
Hibari Logo
  //  
2010
Strong consistency, Highly reliableLimited adoption, Complex Erlang-based setupKey-Value, Distributed0.0273
Percona Server for MongoDB Logo
Percona Server for MongoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2015
Enterprise features, Security enhancements, Open source, Improved scalabilityDependent on MongoDB updates, Niche community supportDocument, Distributed146.9k212
OrigoDB Logo
  //  
unknown
In-Memory Performance, Simple APILimited Scale for Large Deployments, Relativity NewIn-Memory, Document0137
NosDB Logo
  //  
2015
Scalability, NoSQL capabilitiesLimited ecosystem, Learning curve for new usersDocument, Distributed7.9k44
Amazon DynamoDB Logo
Amazon DynamoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2012
Fully managed, High scalability, Event-driven architecture, Strong and eventual consistency optionsComplex pricing model, Query limitations compared to SQLDocument, Key-Value, Distributed762.1m0
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2017
Global distribution, Multi-model capabilities, High availabilityCan be costly, Complex pricing modelDocument, Graph, Key-Value, Columnar, Distributed723.2m0
Couchbase Logo
CouchbaseHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
High performance, Flexibility with data models, Scalability, Strong mobile support with Couchbase LiteComplex setup for beginners, Lacks built-in analytics supportDocument, Key-Value, Distributed62.6k0
Informix Logo
InformixHas Managed Cloud Offering
1981
High performance with OLTP workloads, Excellent support for time series data, Low administrative overheadSmaller community support compared to others, Perceived as outdated by some developersRelational, Time Series, Document13.4m0
Firebase Realtime Database Logo
Firebase Realtime DatabaseHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
Real-time synchronization, Offline capabilities, Integrates well with other Firebase productsNo native support for complex queries, Not suited for large datasetsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Google Cloud FirestoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2019
Seamless integration with Firebase, Realtime updates, ScalabilityCost can escalate, Limited querying capabilitiesDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Google Cloud Datastore Logo
Google Cloud DatastoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
Scalable NoSQL database, Fully managed, Integration with other Google Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Complexity in querying complex relationshipsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Highly available, ScalableComplexity in setup, Not suitable for complex queriesKey-Value, Distributed2.2k0
Oracle NoSQL Logo
Oracle NoSQLHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
High performance, Auto-sharding, Integration with Oracle ecosystemComplex management, Oracle licensing costsDistributed, Document, Key-Value15.8m0
Microsoft Azure Table Storage Logo
Microsoft Azure Table StorageHas Managed Cloud Offering
2010
High availability, Massive scalability, Cost-effectiveLimited query capabilities, No complex queries or joinsDistributed, Key-Value723.2m0
InterSystems IRIS Logo
InterSystems IRISHas Managed Cloud Offering
2018
High performance, Integrated support for multiple data models, Strong interoperabilityComplex licensing, Steeper learning curve for new usersMultivalue DBMS, Distributed120.4k0
Amazon DocumentDB Logo
Amazon DocumentDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2019
Fully managed service, MongoDB compatibility, High availabilityVendor lock-in, Costly at scaleDocument, Distributed762.1m0
Amazon SimpleDB Logo
Amazon SimpleDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2007
NoSQL data store, Fully managed, Flexible and scalableNot suitable for large performance-intensive workloads, Limited querying capabilitiesDistributed, Key-Value762.1m0
Embedability, High performance, Low overheadLess known in the modern tech stack, Limited communityDocument, Key-Value82.6k0
D3 Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADistributed, Document101.4k0
Rockset Logo
RocksetHas Managed Cloud Offering
2018
Real-time analytics, Built-in connectors, SQL-poweredCan be costly, Limited to analytical workloadsAnalytical, Distributed, Document7.6k0
HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Logo
HPE Ezmeral Data FabricHas Managed Cloud Offering
2009
Scalability, High Performance, Integrated Data StoreComplexity, CostDistributed, Key-Value, Document, Time Series2.9m0
HarperDB Logo
HarperDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2017
Schema flexibility, High performance for mixed workloads, Easy deploymentRelatively new in the market, Limited enterprise adoptionDistributed, Document2.9k0
OpenQM Logo
2004
MultiValue DBMS capabilities, Cost-effectiveNiche market, Smaller communityMultivalue DBMS00
Faircom DB Logo
Faircom DBHas Managed Cloud Offering
1979
Hybrid data model, Proven reliabilityCostly licensing, Complex deploymentDocument, Relational, Embedded4.8k0
Scalable, Designed for time series data, High availabilityComplex setup, Limited query language supportTime Series, Key-Value2.2k0
Simplicity, Key-value storeLimited feature set, Not suitable for large-scale applicationsDocument, Key-Value00
Fast key-value storage, Simple APILimited feature set, No managed cloud offeringKey-Value1.1k0
Flexible architecture, Supports federationLimited maturity, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed1.7k0
Bangdb Logo
BangdbHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
High performance, Supports AI and machine learningLimited community support, Less known compared to mainstream databasesKey-Value, Document4.1k0
ScaleOut StateServer Logo
ScaleOut StateServerHas Managed Cloud Offering
2005
Distributed in-memory data grid, Real-time analyticsLimited integrations, Licensing costsIn-Memory, Distributed1.9k0
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document4.8k0
Acebase Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADocument, NoSQL0.00
SWC-DB Logo
Unknown
N/AN/AWide Column, Distributed00
BergDB Logo
Unknown
N/AN/AIn-Memory, Distributed00
Cachelot.io Logo
  //  
2016
High performance, In-memory key-value storageLimited feature set, Primarily for cachingIn-Memory, Key-Value1440
CortexDB Logo
CortexDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2020
Graph-based, Schema-lessEmerging technology, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed00
Optimized for edge computing, Low latency processing, Real-time analyticsLimited support for complex query languages, May require specialized hardwareDistributed, Machine Learning890
Helium Logo
2019
Highly efficient, Immutable storageLimited query options, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Document, Distributed880
High write throughput, Efficient storage managementNot suitable for complex queries, Limited built-in analyticsKey-Value, Embedded0.00
SvectorDB Logo
SvectorDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2021
Handling Vector Data, Scalable ArchitectureEmerging TechnologyVector DBMS, Machine Learning30

Overview of NoSQL

NoSQL databases, a stark departure from traditional relational databases, have emerged as a popular alternative for handling large volumes of unstructured data. The term "NoSQL" stands for "Not Only SQL," emphasizing their ability to work with both structured and unstructured data without relying on the tabular relationships characteristic of SQL databases. They are particularly well-suited for web-scale applications, where rapid and flexible scaling is essential.

Traditionally, databases have been designed around tables and rigid schemas that define how data can be stored and accessed. NoSQL databases, in contrast, offer a more flexible approach. They provide a horizontal scaling structure and excellent performance in terms of speed and reliability, making them ideal for handling big data, real-time web applications, and distributed performant systems.

Key Features & Syntax of NoSQL

NoSQL databases come in various types, each with unique features and syntax. The major types of NoSQL databases include:

  1. Document Stores
    These store data in document formats like JSON, BSON, or XML. MongoDB is a prime example of this category, using JSON-like documents to store data.

    Syntax Example in MongoDB:

    { "name": "John Doe", "email": "john@example.com", "age": 29 }
  2. Key-Value Stores
    Data is stored as a collection of key-value pairs, similar to a dictionary in programming languages. Examples include Redis and DynamoDB.

    Syntax Example in Redis:

    SET name "John Doe"
    GET name
    
  3. Column-Family Stores
    These are optimized for reading and writing large volumes of data across numerous rows and columns. Apache Cassandra is a well-known example.

    Syntax Example in Cassandra with CQL:

    CREATE TABLE users ( user_id UUID PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT, email TEXT );
  4. Graph Databases
    Designed to store data as nodes, edges, and properties in a graph, Neo4j is the most notable example of a graph database.

    Syntax Example in Neo4j using Cypher:

    CREATE (n:Person {name: 'John Doe', age: 29})
    RETURN n
    

Each NoSQL database type provides specific benefits depending on the use case, offering flexibility in schema design and data integrity.

Common Use Cases for NoSQL

NoSQL databases have carved out distinct areas where their features shine:

  1. Big Data Applications
    With the rapid generation of data from various digital sources, NoSQL databases can efficiently handle large volumes of data, be it structured, semi-structured, or unstructured.

  2. Real-Time Web Applications
    High-concurrency environments such as online gaming, chat applications, and streaming services benefit from the fast read/write capabilities of NoSQL databases.

  3. Content Management Systems
    So much digital content today is unstructured (videos, blogs, images), making NoSQL a fitting choice for CMS that needs to handle varied data efficiently.

  4. Internet of Things (IoT)
    IoT applications involve collecting data from diverse and numerous sensors, necessitating a database that can evolve dynamically as data structures change.

  5. Personalization Engines
    Real-time analysis and adaptation to user preferences utilize NoSQL databases' ability to store and quickly query large volumes of data on user behavior.

Advantages of Using NoSQL

The advantages of NoSQL databases are highlighted in several key aspects:

  • Scalability
    Designed for horizontal scaling, NoSQL databases can handle vast amounts of traffic and data volume by simply adding more servers.

  • Flexibility
    Schemaless designs allow developers to make changes to the data model without affecting existing data, facilitating rapid development and iteration.

  • High Availability
    Many NoSQL systems are designed to operate across multiple data centers, providing redundancy to ensure data availability and disaster recovery.

  • Cost-Effectiveness
    Open-source NoSQL databases can reduce licensing costs, and their ability to run on commodity hardware decreases infrastructure expenses.

Limitations and Challenges of NoSQL

Despite the numerous benefits, NoSQL databases are not without their challenges:

  • Consistency
    Most NoSQL databases trade-off consistency for availability and partition tolerance (CAP theorem), which may not be suitable for all applications.

  • Maturity and Support
    Some NoSQL solutions are comparatively new to the database technology landscape, with fewer support resources and smaller community bases.

  • Tooling and Expertise
    The diversity of NoSQL databases means the tooling isn't as mature or uniform as it is for SQL databases, often requiring specialized knowledge.

  • Complexity of Management
    Especially in large distributed systems, managing backups, recovery, and performance can be more complex compared to traditional RDBMSs.

Comparing NoSQL with Other Query Languages

When compared to traditional SQL:

  • Data Model
    SQL uses structured schema-driven data models, while NoSQL supports more flexible schema designs.

  • Scalability
    SQL databases scale vertically, whereas NoSQL databases scale horizontally, making the latter more suited for distributed environments.

  • Joins and Transactions
    SQL supports complex queries, joins, and transactions natively, which might require workarounds or are not efficiently supported in NoSQL systems.

  • Flexibility
    NoSQL offers greater flexibility in handling different data types and formats compared to the rigid tables of SQL databases.

Future Developments in NoSQL

The NoSQL space is continuously evolving, with several interesting trends and advancements on the horizon:

  • Integration with Machine Learning
    As AI develops, NoSQL databases are expected to become more compatible and integrated with machine learning platforms to enhance data analysis capabilities.

  • Improved Consistency Models
    Research into consistency models continues, aiming to provide more robust solutions that balance the CAP theorem constraints more effectively.

  • Enhanced Security Features
    The continuous development of security standards and features aims to bring NoSQL databases up to par with the rigorous requirements of enterprise environments.

  • Cloud-Native Offerings
    As cloud adoption accelerates, NoSQL databases will increasingly offer cloud-native features, such as serverless options and automated scaling and management.

Conclusion

NoSQL databases have reshaped the landscape of data storage and management in the digital age. Their scalability, flexibility, and performance have made them a preferred choice for a variety of applications ranging from big data to real-time web services. While they present certain challenges, the ongoing development and community support are steadily addressing these limitations. As technology continues to advance, the role of NoSQL databases will undoubtedly expand, enabling innovative solutions to previously complex data management problems.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost