Dragonfly

Top 59 NoSQL Databases

Compare & Find the Best NoSQL Database For Your Project.

Database Types:AllIn-MemoryKey-ValueDocumentDistributed
Query Languages:AllNoSQLCustom APIJSONPathREST
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
Redis Logo
  //  
2009
In-memory data store, High performance, Flexible data structures, Simple and powerful APILimited durability, Single-threaded structureIn-Memory, Key-Value70618267079
RethinkDB Logo
  //  
2009
Real-time changes to query results, JSON document storageLimited active development, Not as popular as other NoSQL optionsDocument, Distributed277126781
MongoDB Logo
  //  
2009
Document-oriented, Scalable, Flexible schemaConsistency model, Memory usageDocument, NoSQL293707626383
PouchDB Logo
  //  
2012
Offline capabilities, Synchronizes with CouchDB, JavaScript basedLimited scalability, Single-node architectureDocument, Embedded1598516909
ScyllaDB Logo
  //  
2015
Extremely fast, Compatible with Apache Cassandra, Low latencyLimited built-in query language, Requires managing infrastructureDistributed, Wide Column6935113604
OpenSearch Logo
  //  
2021
Open source, Scalable, Real-time search and analyticsRelatively new, Less enterprise support compared to ElasticsearchSearch Engine, Distributed991099825
Apache Cassandra Logo
  //  
2008
High availability, Linear scalability, Fault tolerantComplexity of operation and maintenance, Limited query languageDistributed, Wide Column58162088870
LiteDB Logo
  //  
2016
Single-file database, Lightweight and fast, No SQL server requiredLimited to C# ecosystem, Not suitable for very large scale applicationsDocument, Embedded33758628
Deep Lake Logo
  //  
2020
Optimized for AI and ML, Efficient data versioningComplexity in integration, Niche domain focusMachine Learning, Vector DBMS289448180
LokiJS Logo
  //  
2014
In-memory database, Lightweight, FastLimited scalability, No built-in persistenceIn-Memory06754
IBM Cloudant Logo
  //  
2014
Highly scalable, Managed cloud service, Fully integrated with IBM CloudLimited offline support, Smaller ecosystem compared to other NoSQL databasesDocument, Distributed133548696265
BigchainDB Logo
  //  
2017
High throughput, Decentralized and immutable, Focus on blockchain technologyLimited querying capabilities, Not suitable for high-frequency updatesBlockchain, Distributed11674033
YDB Logo
  //  
2021
High scalability, Fault-tolerantRelatively new, Limited community supportDistributed, Relational67274015
Tarantool Logo
  //  
2010
In-memory performance, Flexible data modelLimited ecosystem, Complex configurationIn-Memory, Distributed42993416
Skytable Logo
  //  
2021
High performance, Scalable, Multi-modelRelatively new, Limited communityKey-Value, Distributed, In-Memory12440
GeoMesa Logo
  //  
2013
Scalable geospatial processing, Integrates with big data tools, Handles spatial and spatiotemporal dataComplex setup, Limited support for certain geospatial queriesGeospatial, Distributed5801433
Infinispan Logo
  //  
2009
Highly scalable, Rich data structures, Supports in-memory cachingComplex configuration, Requires Java environment, Can be resource-intensiveIn-Memory, Distributed24111207
Tigris Logo
  //  
2022
Scalable, Multi-tenancy, Easy to use APIsRelatively new, Limited community supportDocument, Relational7136921
Kyoto Tycoon Logo
  //  
2011
Lightweight, Fast key-value storageLimited query capabilities, Not natively distributedIn-Memory, Key-Value1672276
Hibari Logo
  //  
2010
Strong consistency, Highly reliableLimited adoption, Complex Erlang-based setupKey-Value, Distributed273
Enterprise features, Security enhancements, Open source, Improved scalabilityDependent on MongoDB updates, Niche community supportDocument, Distributed146929212
OrigoDB Logo
  //  
unknown
In-Memory Performance, Simple APILimited Scale for Large Deployments, Relativity NewIn-Memory, Document0137
NosDB Logo
  //  
2015
Scalability, NoSQL capabilitiesLimited ecosystem, Learning curve for new usersDocument, Distributed788644
Fully managed, High scalability, Event-driven architecture, Strong and eventual consistency optionsComplex pricing model, Query limitations compared to SQLDocument, Key-Value, Distributed7620968650
Global distribution, Multi-model capabilities, High availabilityCan be costly, Complex pricing modelDocument, Graph, Key-Value, Columnar, Distributed7231744620
High performance, Flexibility with data models, Scalability, Strong mobile support with Couchbase LiteComplex setup for beginners, Lacks built-in analytics supportDocument, Key-Value, Distributed625770
High performance with OLTP workloads, Excellent support for time series data, Low administrative overheadSmaller community support compared to others, Perceived as outdated by some developersRelational, Time Series, Document133548690
Real-time synchronization, Offline capabilities, Integrates well with other Firebase productsNo native support for complex queries, Not suited for large datasetsDocument, Distributed64171768350
Seamless integration with Firebase, Realtime updates, ScalabilityCost can escalate, Limited querying capabilitiesDocument, Distributed64171768350
Scalable NoSQL database, Fully managed, Integration with other Google Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Complexity in querying complex relationshipsDocument, Distributed64171768350
Highly available, ScalableComplexity in setup, Not suitable for complex queriesKey-Value, Distributed22360
High performance, Auto-sharding, Integration with Oracle ecosystemComplex management, Oracle licensing costsDistributed, Document, Key-Value157979520
High availability, Massive scalability, Cost-effectiveLimited query capabilities, No complex queries or joinsDistributed, Key-Value7231744620
High performance, Integrated support for multiple data models, Strong interoperabilityComplex licensing, Steeper learning curve for new usersMultivalue DBMS, Distributed1203590
Fully managed service, MongoDB compatibility, High availabilityVendor lock-in, Costly at scaleDocument, Distributed7620968650
NoSQL data store, Fully managed, Flexible and scalableNot suitable for large performance-intensive workloads, Limited querying capabilitiesDistributed, Key-Value7620968650
Embedability, High performance, Low overheadLess known in the modern tech stack, Limited communityDocument, Key-Value825720
D3 Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADistributed, Document1014060
Real-time analytics, Built-in connectors, SQL-poweredCan be costly, Limited to analytical workloadsAnalytical, Distributed, Document76150
Scalability, High Performance, Integrated Data StoreComplexity, CostDistributed, Key-Value, Document, Time Series29018150
HarperDB Logo
  //  
2017
Schema flexibility, High performance for mixed workloads, Easy deploymentRelatively new in the market, Limited enterprise adoptionDistributed, Document29480
OpenQM Logo
2004
MultiValue DBMS capabilities, Cost-effectiveNiche market, Smaller communityMultivalue DBMS00
Hybrid data model, Proven reliabilityCostly licensing, Complex deploymentDocument, Relational, Embedded48020
Scalable, Designed for time series data, High availabilityComplex setup, Limited query language supportTime Series, Key-Value22360
Simplicity, Key-value storeLimited feature set, Not suitable for large-scale applicationsDocument, Key-Value00
Fast key-value storage, Simple APILimited feature set, No managed cloud offeringKey-Value10970
Flexible architecture, Supports federationLimited maturity, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed17350
Bangdb Logo
2013
High performance, Supports AI and machine learningLimited community support, Less known compared to mainstream databasesKey-Value, Document40700
Distributed in-memory data grid, Real-time analyticsLimited integrations, Licensing costsIn-Memory, Distributed18960
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document48020
Acebase Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADocument, NoSQL0
SWC-DB Logo
Unknown
N/AN/AWide Column, Distributed00
BergDB Logo
Unknown
N/AN/AIn-Memory, Distributed00
Cachelot.io Logo
  //  
2016
High performance, In-memory key-value storageLimited feature set, Primarily for cachingIn-Memory, Key-Value1440
Graph-based, Schema-lessEmerging technology, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed00
Optimized for edge computing, Low latency processing, Real-time analyticsLimited support for complex query languages, May require specialized hardwareDistributed, Machine Learning890
Helium Logo
2019
Highly efficient, Immutable storageLimited query options, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Document, Distributed880
High write throughput, Efficient storage managementNot suitable for complex queries, Limited built-in analyticsKey-Value, Embedded0
Handling Vector Data, Scalable ArchitectureEmerging TechnologyVector DBMS, Machine Learning30

Overview of NoSQL

NoSQL databases, a stark departure from traditional relational databases, have emerged as a popular alternative for handling large volumes of unstructured data. The term "NoSQL" stands for "Not Only SQL," emphasizing their ability to work with both structured and unstructured data without relying on the tabular relationships characteristic of SQL databases. They are particularly well-suited for web-scale applications, where rapid and flexible scaling is essential.

Traditionally, databases have been designed around tables and rigid schemas that define how data can be stored and accessed. NoSQL databases, in contrast, offer a more flexible approach. They provide a horizontal scaling structure and excellent performance in terms of speed and reliability, making them ideal for handling big data, real-time web applications, and distributed performant systems.

Key Features & Syntax of NoSQL

NoSQL databases come in various types, each with unique features and syntax. The major types of NoSQL databases include:

  1. Document Stores
    These store data in document formats like JSON, BSON, or XML. MongoDB is a prime example of this category, using JSON-like documents to store data.

Syntax Example in MongoDB:
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"age": 29
}
```

  1. Key-Value Stores
    Data is stored as a collection of key-value pairs, similar to a dictionary in programming languages. Examples include Redis and DynamoDB.

Syntax Example in Redis:
```
SET name "John Doe"
GET name
```

  1. Column-Family Stores
    These are optimized for reading and writing large volumes of data across numerous rows and columns. Apache Cassandra is a well-known example.

Syntax Example in Cassandra with CQL:
```sql
CREATE TABLE users (
user_id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT,
email TEXT
);
```

  1. Graph Databases
    Designed to store data as nodes, edges, and properties in a graph, Neo4j is the most notable example of a graph database.

Syntax Example in Neo4j using Cypher:
```
CREATE (n:Person {name: 'John Doe', age: 29})
RETURN n
```

Each NoSQL database type provides specific benefits depending on the use case, offering flexibility in schema design and data integrity.

Common Use Cases for NoSQL

NoSQL databases have carved out distinct areas where their features shine:

  1. Big Data Applications
    With the rapid generation of data from various digital sources, NoSQL databases can efficiently handle large volumes of data, be it structured, semi-structured, or unstructured.
  2. Real-Time Web Applications
    High-concurrency environments such as online gaming, chat applications, and streaming services benefit from the fast read/write capabilities of NoSQL databases.
  3. Content Management Systems
    So much digital content today is unstructured (videos, blogs, images), making NoSQL a fitting choice for CMS that needs to handle varied data efficiently.
  4. Internet of Things (IoT)
    IoT applications involve collecting data from diverse and numerous sensors, necessitating a database that can evolve dynamically as data structures change.
  5. Personalization Engines
    Real-time analysis and adaptation to user preferences utilize NoSQL databases' ability to store and quickly query large volumes of data on user behavior.

Advantages of Using NoSQL

The advantages of NoSQL databases are highlighted in several key aspects:

Limitations and Challenges of NoSQL

Despite the numerous benefits, NoSQL databases are not without their challenges:

Comparing NoSQL with Other Query Languages

When compared to traditional SQL:

Future Developments in NoSQL

The NoSQL space is continuously evolving, with several interesting trends and advancements on the horizon:

Conclusion

NoSQL databases have reshaped the landscape of data storage and management in the digital age. Their scalability, flexibility, and performance have made them a preferred choice for a variety of applications ranging from big data to real-time web services. While they present certain challenges, the ongoing development and community support are steadily addressing these limitations. As technology continues to advance, the role of NoSQL databases will undoubtedly expand, enabling innovative solutions to previously complex data management problems.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost