Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

Top 60 Document Databases

Compare & Find the Best Document Database For Your Project.

Database Types:AllDocumentGraphRelationalDistributed
Query Languages:AllSQLGraphQLNoSQLJSONPath
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
SurrealDB Logo
  //  
2021
Highly scalable, Multi-model database, Supports SQLRelatively new in the market, Limited community supportDocument, Graph, Relational12.5k27.5k
RethinkDB Logo
  //  
2009
Real-time changes to query results, JSON document storageLimited active development, Not as popular as other NoSQL optionsDocument, Distributed2.8k26.8k
MongoDB Logo
MongoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
Document-oriented, Scalable, Flexible schemaConsistency model, Memory usageDocument, NoSQL2.9m26.4k
PouchDB Logo
  //  
2012
Offline capabilities, Synchronizes with CouchDB, JavaScript basedLimited scalability, Single-node architectureDocument, Embedded16.0k16.9k
PostgreSQL Logo
PostgreSQLHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
1996
Open-source, Extensible, Strong support for advanced queriesComplex configuration, Performance tuning can be complexRelational, Object-Oriented, Document1.5m16.3k
ArangoDB Logo
ArangoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2011
Multi-model capabilities, Flexible data modeling, High performanceComplexity in setup, Learning curve for AQLDistributed, Document, Graph16.6k13.6k
LiteDB Logo
  //  
2016
Single-file database, Lightweight and fast, No SQL server requiredLimited to C# ecosystem, Not suitable for very large scale applicationsDocument, Embedded3.4k8.6k
CouchDB Logo
CouchDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2005
Easy replication, Schema-free JSON documents, High availabilityNot designed for complex queries, Slower than some NoSQL databasesDocument, Distributed5.8m6.3k
IBM Cloudant Logo
IBM CloudantHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2014
Highly scalable, Managed cloud service, Fully integrated with IBM CloudLimited offline support, Smaller ecosystem compared to other NoSQL databasesDocument, Distributed13.4m6.3k
OrientDB Logo
  //  
2010
Multi-model capabilities, Highly flexible schema support, Open-sourceComplex setup and maintenance, Performance can degrade with complex queriesGraph, Document2.7k4.8k
TypeDB Logo
  //  
2016
Semantic modeling, Strong inference capabilitiesComplex set-up, Limited third-party integrationGraph, Document1.1k3.8k
RavenDB Logo
RavenDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
Easy to use with full ACID transaction support, Optimized for storing large volumes of documentsLimited ecosystem compared to more established databases, Smaller communityDocument, Distributed13.1k3.6k
TerminusDB Logo
  //  
2019
Graph database capabilities, Version control for data, RDF and JSON-LD supportLimited third-party integrations, Smaller community supportGraph, Document7862.8k
XTDB Logo
  //  
2019
Temporal database capabilities, Flexible schemaRequires in-depth understanding for complex queries, Limited out-of-the-box analytics featuresDocument, Streaming5862.6k
EJDB Logo
  //  
2020
Lightweight, Embedded, Cross-platformLimited scalability, Single-threadedDocument, Embedded91.4k
Realm Logo
RealmHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2011
Mobile-focused, Object-oriented, Offline-firstNot a full SQL replacement, Limited support for complex queriesDocument, Embedded1.6k1.0k
Tigris Logo
TigrisHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2022
Scalable, Multi-tenancy, Easy to use APIsRelatively new, Limited community supportDocument, Relational7.1k921
BaseX Logo
  //  
2005
Efficient XML data processing, Native XML database, XQuery processingNiche use case, Less mature compared to SQL databasesNative XML DBMS, Document2.0k693
ArcadeDB Logo
  //  
2021
Multi-model, Scalable, Easy integrationStill maturing, Limited third-party supportGraph, Document261499
eXist-db Logo
  //  
2000
Native XML database, Supports XQuery and XPath, Schema-less approachLimited scalability compared to relational DBs, Complexity in managing large XML datasetsDocument, Native XML DBMS1.6k429
Sequoiadb Logo
SequoiadbHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2011
High performance, Supports hybrid data models, Flexibility in deploymentLimited global presenceDocument, Search Engine7.7k326
ModeShape Logo
  //  
2009
Supports JCR API, Repository capabilitiesComplex setup, Steep learning curveHierarchical, Document, Content Stores164.1k217
Percona Server for MongoDB Logo
Percona Server for MongoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2015
Enterprise features, Security enhancements, Open source, Improved scalabilityDependent on MongoDB updates, Niche community supportDocument, Distributed146.9k212
OrigoDB Logo
  //  
unknown
In-Memory Performance, Simple APILimited Scale for Large Deployments, Relativity NewIn-Memory, Document0137
NosDB Logo
  //  
2015
Scalability, NoSQL capabilitiesLimited ecosystem, Learning curve for new usersDocument, Distributed7.9k44
DataFS Logo
  //  
2017
Versioned data storage, Metadata management, Data integrityNot optimized for high-speed transactions, Limited scalability compared to distributed databasesDistributed, Document06
Oracle Logo
OracleHas Managed Cloud Offering
1979
Robust performance, Comprehensive features, Strong securityHigh cost, ComplexityRelational, Document, In-Memory15.8m0
Amazon DynamoDB Logo
Amazon DynamoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2012
Fully managed, High scalability, Event-driven architecture, Strong and eventual consistency optionsComplex pricing model, Query limitations compared to SQLDocument, Key-Value, Distributed762.1m0
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2017
Global distribution, Multi-model capabilities, High availabilityCan be costly, Complex pricing modelDocument, Graph, Key-Value, Columnar, Distributed723.2m0
Couchbase Logo
CouchbaseHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
High performance, Flexibility with data models, Scalability, Strong mobile support with Couchbase LiteComplex setup for beginners, Lacks built-in analytics supportDocument, Key-Value, Distributed62.6k0
Informix Logo
InformixHas Managed Cloud Offering
1981
High performance with OLTP workloads, Excellent support for time series data, Low administrative overheadSmaller community support compared to others, Perceived as outdated by some developersRelational, Time Series, Document13.4m0
Firebase Realtime Database Logo
Firebase Realtime DatabaseHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
Real-time synchronization, Offline capabilities, Integrates well with other Firebase productsNo native support for complex queries, Not suited for large datasetsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Google Cloud FirestoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2019
Seamless integration with Firebase, Realtime updates, ScalabilityCost can escalate, Limited querying capabilitiesDocument, Distributed6.4b0
MarkLogic Logo
MarkLogicHas Managed Cloud Offering
2001
Enterprise-grade features, Strong data integration capabilities, Advanced security and data governanceHigh cost, Learning curve for developersDocument, Native XML DBMS9.3k0
Google Cloud Datastore Logo
Google Cloud DatastoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
Scalable NoSQL database, Fully managed, Integration with other Google Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Complexity in querying complex relationshipsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Oracle NoSQL Logo
Oracle NoSQLHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
High performance, Auto-sharding, Integration with Oracle ecosystemComplex management, Oracle licensing costsDistributed, Document, Key-Value15.8m0
Amazon DocumentDB Logo
Amazon DocumentDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2019
Fully managed service, MongoDB compatibility, High availabilityVendor lock-in, Costly at scaleDocument, Distributed762.1m0
CloudKit Logo
CloudKitHas Managed Cloud Offering
2014
Seamless integration with Apple ecosystems, Strong focus on privacy and security, Automatic synchronizationLimited to Apple platforms, Less flexible for non-Apple environmentsDocument, Key-Value420.8m0
Datomic Logo
DatomicHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2012
Immutable data, Temporal queriesLicense cost, Limited in-memory footprintDistributed, Document1.6k0
Embedability, High performance, Low overheadLess known in the modern tech stack, Limited communityDocument, Key-Value82.6k0
D3 Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADistributed, Document101.4k0
Rapid Application Development, User-Friendly InterfaceOutdated Technologies, Limited Community SupportRelational, Document10
Rockset Logo
RocksetHas Managed Cloud Offering
2018
Real-time analytics, Built-in connectors, SQL-poweredCan be costly, Limited to analytical workloadsAnalytical, Distributed, Document7.6k0
HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Logo
HPE Ezmeral Data FabricHas Managed Cloud Offering
2009
Scalability, High Performance, Integrated Data StoreComplexity, CostDistributed, Key-Value, Document, Time Series2.9m0
HarperDB Logo
HarperDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2017
Schema flexibility, High performance for mixed workloads, Easy deploymentRelatively new in the market, Limited enterprise adoptionDistributed, Document2.9k0
SearchBlox Logo
SearchBloxHas Managed Cloud Offering
2003
Full-text search, Easy setupFeature limitations, Scaling challengesSearch Engine, Document10.1k0
Faircom DB Logo
Faircom DBHas Managed Cloud Offering
1979
Hybrid data model, Proven reliabilityCostly licensing, Complex deploymentDocument, Relational, Embedded4.8k0
Cross-platform, Integration with Valentina StudioNiche market, Limited public documentationRelational, Document9.4k0
Jade Logo
1978
Integrated development environment, Object-oriented databaseOlder technology, Limited to Jade platformObject-Oriented, Document8060
Simplicity, Key-value storeLimited feature set, Not suitable for large-scale applicationsDocument, Key-Value00
Flexible architecture, Supports federationLimited maturity, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed1.7k0
Bangdb Logo
BangdbHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
High performance, Supports AI and machine learningLimited community support, Less known compared to mainstream databasesKey-Value, Document4.1k0
Unified platform, JavaScript supportLimited community support, Niche use casesDocument, In-Memory0.00
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document4.8k0
Acebase Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADocument, NoSQL0.00
N/AN/ADocument, Search Engine1560
CortexDB Logo
CortexDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2020
Graph-based, Schema-lessEmerging technology, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed00
Helium Logo
2019
Highly efficient, Immutable storageLimited query options, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Document, Distributed880
iBoxDB Logo
2013
Embedded design, Ease of integrationLimited scalability, Small community supportDocument, Embedded1630
JasDB Logo
  //  
2012
Flexible data model, JSON supportLimited commercial support, Basic querying capabilitiesDocument, Embedded00

Understanding Document Databases

Document databases, also known as document-oriented databases, are an essential segment of NoSQL databases, designed to store, retrieve, and manage document-oriented information. In the context of databases, a "document" is a set of data organized in a format like JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), BSON (Binary JSON), XML (eXtensible Markup Language), or YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language). This organizational structure differs from traditional relational databases that store data in tables with fixed schemas.

These databases have emerged to address the increasing needs of applications that handle extensive volumes of unstructured and semi-structured data. By providing flexibility in the way documents are modeled and stored, document databases facilitate rapid development cycles and offer high scalability, making them ideal for real-time web, mobile applications, and any system that requires dynamic data handling.

Key Features & Properties of Document Databases

Schema Flexibility

One of the most significant benefits of document databases is the schema-less nature. This flexibility allows developers to insert documents without defining their structure in advance. It is particularly advantageous in situations where data structures can change over time, ensuring seamless integration of new features and updates.

Nested Documents and Rich Hierarchies

Document databases support nested documents, enabling complex data relationships to be represented naturally. This nesting allows for hierarchical data models and reduces the need for extensive joins, typically required in relational databases.

Indexing Capabilities

Advanced indexing features in document databases allow queries to be executed efficiently. They support indexes on fields within documents, including nested fields, and provide full-text search capabilities to enhance query performance.

Horizontal Scalability

Document databases are designed to scale out horizontally. They can distribute data across multiple servers, ensuring high availability and load balancing. As data volume increases, new nodes can be added to accommodate growth without impacting performance.

Strong Support for RESTful APIs

Many document databases integrate seamlessly with RESTful APIs, making them highly compatible with modern web technologies and microservices architecture. This simplifies connectivity and data exchange between client and server applications.

Common Use Cases for Document Databases

Content Management Systems (CMS)

Document databases are commonly used in CMS applications due to their ability to handle diverse and evolving content types. Their flexibility permits the storage of varied document structures, aligning perfectly with the dynamic nature of content management.

Catalogs and Inventory Management

Retail applications benefit significantly from document databases by managing complex and varied inventory records. The ability to store each product with unique attributes without restrictions of a rigid schema is a compelling advantage.

Real-Time Analytics

Applications requiring real-time data analysis, such as monitoring and IoT services, can leverage document databases for their agile storage mechanisms and robust querying abilities. This supports the rapid retrieval and processing of data for immediate insights.

Personalized Experiences

Document databases support applications that need to store user profiles and preferences flexibly, enabling personalized user experiences. This advantage is crucial for applications in domains like online retail, media, and social networking platforms.

Comparing Document Databases with Other Database Models

Document vs. Relational Databases

Relational databases rely on pre-defined schemas and store data in tabular formats, while document databases provide schema-less structures and store data as independent documents. The latter offers superior flexibility and scalability but might lack the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees of relational systems without additional configurations.

Document vs. Key-Value Stores

Key-value stores offer even simpler data storage by associating unique keys with values. However, document databases enhance this model by organizing data more comprehensively within documents, supporting more complex query operations.

Document vs. Columnar Databases

Columnar databases are optimized for analytical queries and store data in columns, offering high efficiency for read-intensive applications. In contrast, document databases are more suited for OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) where dynamic data handling and diverse record structures are necessary.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Document Databases

Nature of Data

Consider the flexibility and dynamism of your data. Document databases excel in environments where data types change frequently or are not uniformly structured.

Scaling Requirements

Evaluate your application’s scaling needs. Document databases support horizontal scaling and are well-suited for applications anticipating growth or distributed architectures.

Performance Needs

Consider your application's read and write requirements. Document databases can manage high volumes of concurrent reads and writes thanks to their distributed architecture.

Complexity of Queries

While document databases handle complex queries well, assess your query needs as relational databases might be more effective with complex joins and multi-table aggregations.

Consistency Models

Document databases often trade-off strict consistency for availability and partition tolerance. Consider the consistency requirements specific to your application.

Best Practices for Implementing Document Databases

Design with Future Flexibility

When modeling data, anticipate the need for future modifications. Leverage the database's inherent flexibility to accommodate potential changes without needing to redesign schemas.

Optimize Indexing Strategies

Effective indexing is crucial for performance. Regularly analyze query patterns and adjust indexes to support frequently accessed data paths, ensuring efficient retrieval.

Plan for Consistency and Partitioning

Understand your application's consistency requirements, and configure databases to balance between availability and partition tolerance. Select the appropriate model that supports your application needs.

Regularly Monitor Performance

Use tools and metrics to monitor database performance continually. Proactively manage bottlenecks and optimize resource allocation to maintain optimal performance levels.

Utilize Built-in Features

Take advantage of the database's native features like built-in sharding, replication, and security measures, reducing the overhead of implementing similar functionality externally.

Future Trends in Document Databases

Enhanced Integration with AI and Machine Learning

As AI and machine learning advance, document databases are likely to offer enhanced integration capabilities, supporting data-driven decision-making through intelligent data analysis and storage.

Evolution of Multi-Model Capabilities

Document databases are expected to evolve by offering multi-model capabilities, allowing users to leverage graph, key-value, and columnar features alongside document-oriented features for more holistic data management.

Improved Data Security Measures

As cyber threats continue to evolve, document databases will likely enhance security features, including encryption and advanced authentication, to safeguard sensitive data more effectively.

Serverless and Cloud-Native Expansion

Document databases are projected to expand in serverless and cloud-native environments, offering more flexibility and cost-effectiveness in handling varying workloads and dynamic resource allocation.

Conclusion

Document databases play a crucial role in modern data architecture by offering unparalleled flexibility, scalability, and performance in handling diverse and dynamic datasets. These databases empower developers to adopt agile development practices and respond rapidly to changing data requirements. As technology evolves, the future of document databases promises enhanced integration, security, and adaptability, ensuring they remain indispensable in supporting the needs of modern applications.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost