Dragonfly

Top 123 Relational Databases

Compare & Find the Best Relational Database For Your Project.

Database Types:AllRelationalNewSQLDistributedDocument
Query Languages:AllSQLGraphQLJSONPathT-SQL
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
TiDB Logo
  //  
2016
Horizontal scalability, Strong consistency, High availability, MySQL compatibilityComplex architecture, Relatively new community supportRelational, NewSQL, Distributed16352737307
CockroachDB Logo
  //  
2015
Distributed SQL, Strong consistency, High availability and reliabilityRelatively new technology, Complex to set upRelational, Distributed, NewSQL9612930151
SurrealDB Logo
  //  
2021
Highly scalable, Multi-model database, Supports SQLRelatively new in the market, Limited community supportDocument, Graph, Relational1245827544
Vitess Logo
  //  
2011
Scalability, Efficiency with MySQL, Cloud-native, High availabilityComplex setup, Limited support for non-MySQL databasesDistributed, Relational1512718697
Dolt Logo
  //  
2019
Git-like version control for data, Facilitates collaboration and branchingRelatively new with limited adoption, Potential performance issues with very large datasetsRelational, Distributed3018817976
TimescaleDB Logo
  //  
2018
Excellent time-series support, Built on PostgreSQLRequires PostgreSQL knowledge, Limited features compared to specialized DBMSRelational, Time Series14633217911
PostgreSQL Logo
  //  
1996
Open-source, Extensible, Strong support for advanced queriesComplex configuration, Performance tuning can be complexRelational, Object-Oriented, Document154896816254
QuestDB Logo
  //  
2019
High-performance for time-series data, SQL compatibility, Fast ingestionLimited ecosystem, Relatively newer databaseTime Series, Relational3253614626
SQL.JS Logo
  //  
2013
Runs entirely in the browser, No server setup required, Supports SQL standardLimited storage capabilities, Dependent on browser resourcesRelational, Embedded72712795
MySQL Logo
  //  
1995
Open-source, Wide adoption, ReliableLimited scalability for large data volumesRelational320237810889
Citus Logo
  //  
2011
Distributed SQL, Scalable PostgreSQL, Performance for big dataRequires PostgreSQL expertise, Complex query optimizationDistributed, Relational970410622
Integration with Microsoft products, Business intelligence capabilitiesRuns best on Windows platforms, License costsRelational, In-Memory72317446210076
StarRocks Logo
  //  
2020
Fast query performance, Unified data model, ScalabilityRelatively new softwareAnalytical, Relational, Distributed519029011
Lovefield Logo
  //  
2015
Client-side database, Supports SQL-like queries in JavaScript, Optimized for web applicationsLimited to client-side usage, No longer actively maintainedRelational, In-Memory6813
SQLite Logo
  //  
2000
Serverless, Lightweight, Broadly supportedLimited to single-user access, Not suitable for high write loadsRelational, Embedded4877226737
MariaDB Logo
  //  
2009
Open-source, MySQL compatibility, Robust community supportLesser enterprise adoption compared to MySQL, Feature differences with MySQLRelational1764455680
Apache Hive Logo
  //  
2010
Batch processing, Integration with Hadoop ecosystem, SQL-like queryingNot suited for real-time analytics, Higher latencyDistributed, Relational58162085556
H2 Logo
  //  
2005
Lightweight, Embedded support, FastLimited scalability, In-memory by defaultRelational, Embedded616164216
CrateDB Logo
  //  
2014
Scalable distributed SQL database, Handles time-series data efficiently, Native full-text search capabilitiesLimited support for complex joins, Relatively new with possible growing painsDistributed, Relational, Time Series3044126
YDB Logo
  //  
2021
High scalability, Fault-tolerantRelatively new, Limited community supportDistributed, Relational67274015
MatrixOne Logo
  //  
2021
High performance, Scalability, Flexible architectureRelatively new, may have fewer community resourcesNewSQL, Distributed, Relational331788
PostGIS Logo
  //  
2001
Robust geospatial data support, Integrates with PostgreSQLComplexity in learning, Database size managementGeospatial, Relational824751751
Comdb2 Logo
  //  
2018
High performance, Distributed transactions, Designed for cloud environmentsLimited documentation, Smaller communityRelational1392
Firebird Logo
  //  
2000
Lightweight, Cross-platform, Strong SQL supportSmaller community, Fewer modern featuresRelational, Embedded485981260
Enhanced performance, Increased security, Enterprise-grade featuresRequires tuning for optimal performance, Community supportRelational1469291157
Apache Phoenix Logo
  //  
2014
SQL interface over HBase, Integrates with Hadoop ecosystem, High performanceHBase dependency, Limited SQL supportRelational, Wide Column58162081026
Tigris Logo
  //  
2022
Scalable, Multi-tenancy, Easy to use APIsRelatively new, Limited community supportDocument, Relational7136921
Virtuoso Logo
  //  
1998
Supports multiple data models, Good RDF and SPARQL supportComplex setup, Performance variationRelational, RDF Stores12254867
Apache HAWQ Logo
  //  
2013
SQL-on-Hadoop, High-performance, Seamless scalabilityComplex setup, Resource-heavyAnalytical, Relational5816208696
WhiteDB Logo
  //  
2011
In-memory database, Competitive read and write speedLimited persistence, No cloud offeringIn-Memory, Relational43608
Apache Derby Logo
  //  
2004
Lightweight, Pure Java implementation, EmbeddableLimited scalability, Not suitable for very large databasesRelational, Embedded5816208346
Cubrid Logo
  //  
2008
Open-source, High availability, Optimized for web servicesLimited support outside of C, C++, and JavaRelational11110264
EdgelessDB Logo
  //  
2020
Confidential computing, End-to-end encryption, High securityHigher overhead due to encryption, Potentially complex setup for non-security expertsDistributed, Relational2026170
Tajo Logo
  //  
2013
High performance, Extensible architecture, Supports SQL standardsLimited community support, Not widely adoptedAnalytical, Relational, Distributed5816208135
Oracle Logo
1979
Robust performance, Comprehensive features, Strong securityHigh cost, ComplexityRelational, Document, In-Memory157979520
ACID compliance, Multi-platform support, High availability featuresLegacy technology, Steep learning curveRelational133548690
Easy to use, Integration with Microsoft Office, Rapid application developmentLimited scalability, Windows-only platformRelational7231744620
Scalability, Integration with Microsoft ecosystem, Security features, High availabilityCost for high performance, Requires specific skill set for optimizationRelational, Distributed7231744620
Ease of use, Rapid application development, Cross-platform compatibilityLimited scalability, Less flexibility for complex queriesRelational2796840
Real-time analytics, In-memory data processing, Supports mixed workloadsHigh cost, Complexity in setup and configurationRelational, In-Memory, Columnar69779620
Scalable data warehousing, High concurrency, Advanced analytics capabilitiesHigh cost, Complex data modelingRelational1328880
Strong transactional support, High performance for OLTP workloads, Comprehensive security featuresHigh total cost of ownership, Legacy platform that may not integrate well with modern toolsRelational69779620
High performance with OLTP workloads, Excellent support for time series data, Low administrative overheadSmaller community support compared to others, Perceived as outdated by some developersRelational, Time Series, Document133548690
High-performance data warehousing, Scalable architecture, Tight integration with AWS servicesCost can accumulate with large data sets, Latencies in certain analytical workloadsColumnar, Relational7620968650
dBASE Logo
1980
Ease of use, Low resource requirementsLimited scalability, Older technologyRelational40200
High availability, Scalable, Fully managed by AWSTied to AWS ecosystem, Potentially higher costsRelational, Distributed7620968650
Greenplum Logo
  //  
2005
Massively parallel processing, Scalable for big data, Open sourceComplex setup, Heavy resource useAnalytical, Relational, Distributed279090
High performance analytics, Simplicity of deploymentCost, Vendor lock-inAnalytical, Relational133548690
Fast analytics, Scalable, Operational and analytical workloadsHigh complexity for certain queries, Learning curve for database administratorsRelational, Columnar429590
Small footprint, High performance, Strong security featuresLimited modern community support, Lacks some advanced features of larger databasesRelational, Embedded3573700
Scalable architecture, Comprehensive development tools, Multi-platform supportProprietary system, Complex licensing modelRelational3634350
Ingres Logo
1980
Enterprise-grade features, Robust security, High performanceLess community support compared to mainstream databases, Older technologyRelational825720
Embedded database capabilities, Reliable sync technology, Low resource usageLimited scalability compared to major databases, Slightly dated interfaceRelational, Embedded69779620
HyperSQL Logo
  //  
2001
Lightweight, In-memory capability, Standards compliance with SQLLimited scalability for very large datasets, Limited feature set compared to larger RDBMSRelational, In-Memory25590
Globally distributed with strong consistency, High availability and low latencyHigh cost, Limited control over infrastructureDistributed, Relational, NewSQL64171768350
SAP IQ Logo
1994
High performance for analytical queries, Compression capabilities, Strong support for business intelligence toolsProprietary software, Complex setup and maintenanceColumnar, Relational69779620
4D Logo
1984
Comprehensive development platform, Integrated with web and mobile solutions, Easy to use for non-developersLimited to small to medium applications, Less flexible compared to open-source solutions, Can be costly for large scaleRelational380270
MaxDB Logo
  //  
1987
Enterprise-grade stability, SAP integration, Handles large volumes of dataLesser known outside SAP ecosystem, Not as flexible as newer databases, Limited community supportRelational69779620
Enterprise-grade support and features, Open-source based, High compatibility with OracleCan be complex to manage without expertise, More costly than standard open-source PostgreSQL for enterprise featuresRelational6397690
EXASOL Logo
2000
High-speed analytics, Columnar storage, In-memory processingExpensive licensing, Limited data type supportRelational, Analytical89670
SpatiaLite Logo
  //  
2008
Supports spatial data types, Lightweight and fully self-containedNot suitable for large-scale enterprise applications, Limited concurrencyRelational, Geospatial28020
Tibero Logo
2003
Oracle compatibility, High performanceLimited integration with non-Tibero ecosystems, Smaller market presence compared to leading RDBMSRelational186400
mSQL Logo
1994
Lightweight, Embedded systemsObsolete compared to current databases, Limited support and featuresRelational, Embedded2350
In-memory, Real-time data processingRequires more RAM, Not suitable for large datasetsIn-Memory, Relational157979520
High scalability, Advanced analytics with embedded machine learningCost, Complex configurationRelational, Analytical133548690
Mnesia Logo
1993
Integrates with Erlang/OTP, Supports complex data structures, Highly availableLimited to Erlang ecosystem, Not suitable for very large datasetsDistributed, Relational, In-Memory740900
GBase Logo
2004
Strong support for Chinese language data, Good for OLAP and OLTPLimited international adoption, Documentation primarily in ChineseRelational, Analytical158810
openGauss Logo
  //  
2020
High Performance, Extensibility, Security FeaturesCommunity Still Growing, Limited Third-Party IntegrationsDistributed, Relational381700
HFSQL Logo
2005
Embedded Database Capabilities, Ease of UseLimited to PC SOFT Environment, Less Market Presence Compared to Mainstream DBMSEmbedded, Relational519430
Low Maintenance, Integrated FeaturesAging Technology, Limited AdoptionRelational, Embedded960
Rapid Application Development, User-Friendly InterfaceOutdated Technologies, Limited Community SupportRelational, Document10
High Stability, Excellent Performance on Digital EquipmentNiche Market, High Cost of OperationRelational157979520
High availability, Fault tolerance, ScalabilityLegacy system complexities, High costRelational, Distributed29018150
High availability, Strong consistency, ScalabilityVendor lock-in, Limited third-party supportRelational, Distributed131173210
Cost-effective, Compatible with MySQL, High performanceComplex pricing modelRelational, Distributed12982860
Advanced analytical capabilities, Designed for big data, High concurrencyCost can increase with scaleAnalytical, Relational12982860
Hybrid architecture supporting in-memory and disk storage, Real-time transaction processingLimited global market penetration, Requires specialized knowledge for optimal deploymentRelational, In-Memory8330
NuoDB Logo
2010
Supports distributed SQL databases, Elastic scale-out with ACID complianceNot suitable for write-heavy workloads, Complex configuration for optimal performanceDistributed, NewSQL, Relational10
High performance, Scalable architecture, Supports complex queriesLimited managed cloud options, Proprietary solutionAnalytical, Relational, Distributed59900
High-performance data analysis, PostgreSQL compatibility, Seamless integration with Alibaba Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Limited to Alibaba Cloud environmentAnalytical, Relational, Distributed12982860
Proven reliability, Strong ACID complianceLegacy system, Limited modern featuresRelational, Hierarchical25058290
DBISAM Logo
1998
Embedded database, Small footprint, Easy integrationLimited scalability, Not open-sourceRelational, Embedded4940
Handles large-scale data, Accelerates query performanceResource-intensive, Complex tuning requiredAnalytical, Columnar, Relational97970
High-speed in-memory processing, ACID compliance, Embedded database optionsProprietary technology, Limited community supportIn-Memory, Relational133548690
Cross-platform support, High reliability, Full SQL implementationLower popularity, Limited recent updatesRelational240
High reliability, Strong support for business applicationsOlder technology stack, May not integrate easily with modern systemsHierarchical, Relational6310
R:BASE Logo
1981
Established user base, Stable for legacy systemsOutdated technology, Limited community supportRelational00
High-performance, Embedded database, SQL supportLack of widespread adoption, Limited cloud supportEmbedded, Relational38990
HTAP capabilities, Machine LearningComplex setup, Limited community supportAnalytical, Distributed, Relational3810
High compatibility with Oracle, Robust security features, Strong transaction processingLimited global awareness, Smaller community supportRelational873800
Embedded database solution, Easy integration with .NET applicationsLimited scalability, Windows platform dependencyRelational, Embedded00
High performance for embedded systems, Real-time data processingNiche use case focus, Smaller developer communityRelational, Embedded8990
Postgres-XL Logo
  //  
2014
Scalability, PostgreSQL compatibility, High availabilityComplex setup, Limited community support compared to PostgreSQLDistributed, Relational1330
Database traffic management, Load balancingNot a database itself but a proxy, Complex deploymentRelational, NewSQL00
High performance, In-memory database technology, Integration capabilitiesLimited market presence, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Relational00
Scalable transactions, Hybrid transactional/analytical processingLimited adoption, Complex setupNewSQL, Distributed, Relational00
GPU acceleration, Real-time analyticsHigh hardware cost, Complex integrationAnalytical, Relational2340
Enterprise-grade security features, Enhanced performance and scalability, Advanced analytics and data visualizationHigher cost for enterprise features, Limited community-driven developmentsRelational17907220
Designed for continuous aggregation, Integrates with PostgreSQLLimited to streaming workloads, Small community sizeRelational, Streaming, Time Series00
High concurrency, Embedded supportLimited community, Less popular compared to other relational databasesRelational12030
Hybrid data model, Proven reliabilityCostly licensing, Complex deploymentDocument, Relational, Embedded48020
High-speed data processing, Seamless integration with Apache Spark, In-memory processingRequires technical expertise to manageDistributed, In-Memory, Relational1556360
Real-time event storage and analytics, Integration with IBM Cloud servicesLimited third-party integrations, IBM Cloud dependencyEvent Stores, In-Memory, Relational133548690
Multi-model database supporting SQL and graphs, Combines relational and graph processingSolid understanding of SQL and graph databases required, Smaller community supportGraph, Relational00
High availability, Geographically distributed architectureLimited market penetration, Complex setupDistributed, Relational00
Strong data security, High performanceProprietary system, CostRelational, Embedded825720
Cross-platform, Integration with Valentina StudioNiche market, Limited public documentationRelational, Document94070
SQL support on Hadoop, Scalable, Robust queryingComplex to manage, Requires Hadoop expertiseRelational, Distributed880
MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) capabilities, High-performance analyticsProprietary technology, Niche use casesAnalytical, Distributed, Relational2930
Small footprint, Embedded database capabilitiesLimited scalability, Less popular than major DBMS optionsEmbedded, Relational4940
AntDB Logo
2010
High concurrency, ScalabilityLimited international adoption, Complexity in setupDistributed, Relational00
Proven reliability, ACID compliantProprietary, Lacks modern featuresRelational1150
Performance, Supports ACID transactionsLimited adoption, Niche marketIn-Memory, Relational, Distributed00
High performance, Scalability, Integration with big data ecosystemsLess known in Western markets, Limited community resourcesAnalytical, Distributed, Relational00
Real-time data processing, Compatibility with multiple data formatsComplex setup, Smaller user communityDistributed, Relational00
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document48020
Lightweight, Java integrationLimited scalability, Fewer features compared to major SQL databasesRelational00
High performance, Compression, ScalabilityProprietary, License costAnalytical, Relational00
Distributed, Scalability, Fault toleranceLimited community support, Complex setupDistributed, Relational00
H2GIS Logo
2015
Integration with Spatial features, Open-sourceLimited support for non-spatial queries, Small communityGeospatial, Relational4160
Linter Logo
1995
Strong SQL compatibility, ACID complianceNiche market focus, Legacy systemRelational16050
High availability, Strong consistency, Scalable architectureProprietary technology, Limited community supportRelational, Distributed00
Integrates with all Azure services, High scalability, Robust analyticsHigh complexity, Cost, Requires Azure ecosystemAnalytical, Distributed, Relational7231744620

Understanding Relational Databases

Relational databases have long held a central position in the world of data management. Since their inception in the 1970s, they have been the backbone for countless applications, from small business systems to large-scale enterprise operations. At the core of a relational database lies the idea of storing data in structured tables, which allows for powerful querying and data manipulation capabilities. Understanding the principles and functionality of relational databases is crucial for anyone working in data-centric fields.

Key Features & Properties of Relational Databases

Relational databases are characterized by several defining features that make them unique and versatile:

  1. Structured Data Storage: Data is organized in tables, which consist of rows and columns. Each row in a table is a data record, and each column represents an attribute of that record.
  2. Schema-Based Design: Relational databases require a predefined schema, which dictates the structure of data and enforces data integrity and consistency.
  3. SQL Query Language: Structured Query Language (SQL) is used to interact with relational databases. It provides a standardized way to perform queries, updates, and management of data.
  4. ACID Properties: Transactions in relational databases follow ACID properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) to ensure reliable data processing.
  5. Normalization: Normalization is the process of structuring a relational database to reduce data redundancy and improve data integrity.
  6. Indexing: Relational databases support indexing to improve the speed of data retrieval operations.
  7. Relationships and Keys: Primary and foreign keys are used to define relationships between tables, enabling complex data models.

Common Use Cases for Relational Databases

Relational databases are prevalent in numerous applications due to their reliability and robustness:

Comparing Relational Databases with Other Database Models

Choosing the right database model depends on the specific requirements of an application:

Factors to Consider When Choosing Relational Databases

Selecting a relational database involves evaluating multiple factors:

  1. Data Volume and Growth: Consider the size of data and expected growth. Relational databases handle moderate to large datasets efficiently.
  2. Complex Queries: If your application requires complex querying capabilities, relational databases are a strong choice.
  3. Transaction Support: For applications needing reliable transaction processing, relational databases offer robust solutions.
  4. Data Consistency: If maintaining data consistency is critical, relational databases provide ACID compliance.
  5. Vendor Support and Community: Evaluate the support ecosystem and community engagement for the chosen relational database.
  6. Cost and Licensing: Consider the cost of deployment and ongoing licensing fees, which can vary across different relational database systems.

Best Practices for Implementing Relational Databases

Implementing a relational database requires adherence to best practices for optimal performance and reliability:

Future Trends in Relational Databases

The landscape of relational databases is evolving, with new trends shaping their use:

Conclusion

Relational databases have been a dominant force in data management for decades, known for their structure, reliability, and robust transaction handling. As technology evolves, they continue to adapt, integrating cloud capabilities, AI, and hybrid models. Understanding their features, use cases, and best practices is essential for leveraging their full potential in modern applications.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost