Dragonfly

Top 131 Healthcare Databases

Compare & Find the Best Healthcare Database For Your Project.

Database Types:AllMachine LearningVector DBMSDocumentNoSQL
Query Languages:AllCustom APINoSQLJSONPathSQL
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
Milvus Logo
  //  
2019
Open-source vector database, Efficient for similarity search, Supports large-scale dataLimited to specific use cases, Complexity in high-dimensional data handlingMachine Learning, Vector DBMS9065830810
MongoDB Logo
  //  
2009
Document-oriented, Scalable, Flexible schemaConsistency model, Memory usageDocument, NoSQL293707626383
DuckDB Logo
  //  
2018
Lightweight and fast, In-memory analyticsLimited scalability, Single-node onlyAnalytical, Columnar4028224416
Qdrant Logo
  //  
2020
High-performance vector search, Easy to use, Open sourceRelatively new with limited ecosystem, Limited query capabilitiesVector DBMS2699320657
Valkey Logo
  //  
2024
High availability, Low latency, Rich data structures, Open-source licensingEmerging community support, Developing documentationIn-Memory, Key-Value, Distributed1898917384
FoundationDB Logo
  //  
2012
ACID transactions, Fault tolerance, ScalabilityLimited to key-value data model, Complex configurationDistributed, Key-Value739314550
Neo4j Logo
  //  
2007
Efficient for graph-based queries, Supports ACID transactions, Good visualization toolsNot suitable for very large datasets, Steep learning curve for complex queriesGraph29027713428
Weaviate Logo
  //  
2018
Built-in machine learning, Vector-based similarity searchesLimited support for complex queries, Relatively new technologyVector DBMS7019811537
Integration with Microsoft products, Business intelligence capabilitiesRuns best on Windows platforms, License costsRelational, In-Memory72317446210076
Deep Lake Logo
  //  
2020
Optimized for AI and ML, Efficient data versioningComplexity in integration, Niche domain focusMachine Learning, Vector DBMS289448180
SQLite Logo
  //  
2000
Serverless, Lightweight, Broadly supportedLimited to single-user access, Not suitable for high write loadsRelational, Embedded4877226737
Apache Hive Logo
  //  
2010
Batch processing, Integration with Hadoop ecosystem, SQL-like queryingNot suited for real-time analytics, Higher latencyDistributed, Relational58162085556
EventStoreDB Logo
  //  
2012
Strong event sourcing features, Efficient stream processingRequires expertise in event-driven architectures, Limited traditional RDBMS supportEvent Stores, Streaming97625321
Apache Ignite Logo
  //  
2014
High-performance in-memory computing, Distributed systems support, SQL compatibility, ScalabilityComplex setup and configuration, Requires JVM environmentDistributed, In-Memory, Machine Learning58162084819
M3DB Logo
  //  
2016
Highly scalable, Optimized for time series data, High availabilitySteep learning curve, Complex setupTime Series, Distributed14769
ObjectBox Logo
  //  
2017
High performance for embedded databases, Efficient object-oriented storageLimited cross-platform support, Smaller community compared to other DBMSEmbedded, Object-Oriented16034410
H2 Logo
  //  
2005
Lightweight, Embedded support, FastLimited scalability, In-memory by defaultRelational, Embedded616164216
TypeDB Logo
  //  
2016
Semantic modeling, Strong inference capabilitiesComplex set-up, Limited third-party integrationGraph, Document10833797
RavenDB Logo
  //  
2009
Easy to use with full ACID transaction support, Optimized for storing large volumes of documentsLimited ecosystem compared to more established databases, Smaller communityDocument, Distributed131373590
TerminusDB Logo
  //  
2019
Graph database capabilities, Version control for data, RDF and JSON-LD supportLimited third-party integrations, Smaller community supportGraph, Document7862783
LMDB Logo
  //  
2011
High performance, Memory mapped, ACID complianceLimited scalability, In-memory constraintsEmbedded, In-Memory, Key-Value9432589
GemFire Logo
  //  
2002
Low latency, Real-time data caching, Distributed in-memory data gridComplex setup, Enterprise pricingIn-Memory, Distributed33382852291
MatrixOne Logo
  //  
2021
High performance, Scalability, Flexible architectureRelatively new, may have fewer community resourcesNewSQL, Distributed, Relational331788
Elassandra Logo
  //  
2018
Combines Elasticsearch and Cassandra, Real-time search and analyticsComplex architecture, Requires deep technical knowledge to manageWide Column, Search Engine, Distributed01716
Vald Logo
  //  
2020
Vector similarity search, ScalabilityYoung project, Limited documentationDistributed, Vector DBMS01538
Elasticsearch Logo
  //  
2010
Full-text search, Scalability, Real-time analyticsComplex configuration, Resource-intensiveSearch Engine, Distributed10700701275
Firebird Logo
  //  
2000
Lightweight, Cross-platform, Strong SQL supportSmaller community, Fewer modern featuresRelational, Embedded485981260
Enhanced performance, Increased security, Enterprise-grade featuresRequires tuning for optimal performance, Community supportRelational1469291157
Apache Jena Logo
  //  
2011
RDF and OWL support, Semantic web technologies integrationLimited to semantic web applications, Complex RDF and SPARQL setupRDF Stores, Graph58162081117
Realm Logo
  //  
2011
Mobile-focused, Object-oriented, Offline-firstNot a full SQL replacement, Limited support for complex queriesDocument, Embedded15781022
Tigris Logo
  //  
2022
Scalable, Multi-tenancy, Easy to use APIsRelatively new, Limited community supportDocument, Relational7136921
Blazegraph Logo
  //  
2006
Scalable graph database, Supports SPARQL queries, High-performance for RDF dataLimited support for complex analytics, Can be challenging to scale beyond certain limitsGraph, RDF Stores347898
Virtuoso Logo
  //  
1998
Supports multiple data models, Good RDF and SPARQL supportComplex setup, Performance variationRelational, RDF Stores12254867
NCache Logo
  //  
2003
Scalability, Distributed caching, Focused on .NET applicationsPrimarily focused on Windows and .NET environmentsIn-Memory, Distributed7886650
BrightstarDB Logo
  //  
2011
RDF data model, Supports SPARQLNiche market, Limited adoptionRDF Stores, Graph0458
MonetDB Logo
  //  
1993
High-performance analytic queries, Columnar storage, Excellent for data warehousingComplex scalability, Smaller community support compared to major RDBMSColumnar, Analytical2744383
TigerGraph Logo
  //  
2012
Optimized for deep-link analytics, Highly scalable graph processingSteep learning curve, Relatively limited community supportGraph, Distributed9622269
Hawkular Metrics Logo
  //  
2015
Time series data management, Integration with monitoring tools, ScalabilityPart of larger ecosystem, Specific to monitoring use casesTime Series, Distributed33234
Enterprise features, Security enhancements, Open source, Improved scalabilityDependent on MongoDB updates, Niche community supportDocument, Distributed146929212
EdgelessDB Logo
  //  
2020
Confidential computing, End-to-end encryption, High securityHigher overhead due to encryption, Potentially complex setup for non-security expertsDistributed, Relational2026170
Tajo Logo
  //  
2013
High performance, Extensible architecture, Supports SQL standardsLimited community support, Not widely adoptedAnalytical, Relational, Distributed5816208135
YottaDB Logo
  //  
2017
Robust transaction support, Open-sourceLimited to specific healthcare applications, Less community supportEmbedded, Hierarchical6376
Oracle Logo
1979
Robust performance, Comprehensive features, Strong securityHigh cost, ComplexityRelational, Document, In-Memory157979520
Scalable data warehousing, Separation of compute and storage, Fully managed serviceHigher cost for small data tasks, Vendor lock-inAnalytical10788670
ACID compliance, Multi-platform support, High availability featuresLegacy technology, Steep learning curveRelational133548690
Easy to use, Integration with Microsoft Office, Rapid application developmentLimited scalability, Windows-only platformRelational7231744620
Splunk Logo
2003
Powerful search and analysis, Real-time monitoring, ScalabilityCost, Complexity for new usersSearch Engine, Streaming7716500
Unified analytics, Collaboration, Scalable data processingComplexity, High cost for larger deploymentsAnalytical, Machine Learning12940130
Scalability, Integration with Microsoft ecosystem, Security features, High availabilityCost for high performance, Requires specific skill set for optimizationRelational, Distributed7231744620
Serverless architecture, Fast, SQL-like queries, Integration with Google ecosystem, ScalabilityCost for large queries, Limited control over infrastructureColumnar, Distributed, Analytical64171768350
Ease of use, Rapid application development, Cross-platform compatibilityLimited scalability, Less flexibility for complex queriesRelational2796840
Real-time analytics, In-memory data processing, Supports mixed workloadsHigh cost, Complexity in setup and configurationRelational, In-Memory, Columnar69779620
Scalable data warehousing, High concurrency, Advanced analytics capabilitiesHigh cost, Complex data modelingRelational1328880
Strong transactional support, High performance for OLTP workloads, Comprehensive security featuresHigh total cost of ownership, Legacy platform that may not integrate well with modern toolsRelational69779620
Global distribution, Multi-model capabilities, High availabilityCan be costly, Complex pricing modelDocument, Graph, Key-Value, Columnar, Distributed7231744620
High performance with OLTP workloads, Excellent support for time series data, Low administrative overheadSmaller community support compared to others, Perceived as outdated by some developersRelational, Time Series, Document133548690
High-performance data warehousing, Scalable architecture, Tight integration with AWS servicesCost can accumulate with large data sets, Latencies in certain analytical workloadsColumnar, Relational7620968650
High availability, Scalable, Fully managed by AWSTied to AWS ecosystem, Potentially higher costsRelational, Distributed7620968650
High performance analytics, Simplicity of deploymentCost, Vendor lock-inAnalytical, Relational133548690
Integrated AI capabilities, Part of Azure ecosystemDependency on Azure environment, Cost considerations for large data setsSearch Engine7231744620
Graphite Logo
  //  
2008
Efficient time series data storage, Easy integration with various toolsLacks advanced analytics features, Limited support for large data volumesTime Series9270
Enterprise-grade features, Strong data integration capabilities, Advanced security and data governanceHigh cost, Learning curve for developersDocument, Native XML DBMS93460
Fast analytics, Scalable, Operational and analytical workloadsHigh complexity for certain queries, Learning curve for database administratorsRelational, Columnar429590
Scalable NoSQL database, Fully managed, Integration with other Google Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Complexity in querying complex relationshipsDocument, Distributed64171768350
Small footprint, High performance, Strong security featuresLimited modern community support, Lacks some advanced features of larger databasesRelational, Embedded3573700
Embedded database capabilities, Reliable sync technology, Low resource usageLimited scalability compared to major databases, Slightly dated interfaceRelational, Embedded69779620
Specialized for vector search, High accuracy and performance, Easy integrationNiche use cases, Limited general database capabilitiesVector DBMS, Machine Learning1283150
Scalable NoSQL database, Real-time analytics, Managed service by Google CloudLimited to Google Cloud Platform, Complexity in schema designDistributed, Wide Column64171768350
Semantic graph database, Supports RDF and linked data, Strong querying with SPARQLLimited to graph-focused use cases, Complex RDF queriesRDF Stores, Graph394920
High performance, Integrated support for multiple data models, Strong interoperabilityComplex licensing, Steeper learning curve for new usersMultivalue DBMS, Distributed1203590
SAP IQ Logo
1994
High performance for analytical queries, Compression capabilities, Strong support for business intelligence toolsProprietary software, Complex setup and maintenanceColumnar, Relational69779620
4D Logo
1984
Comprehensive development platform, Integrated with web and mobile solutions, Easy to use for non-developersLimited to small to medium applications, Less flexible compared to open-source solutions, Can be costly for large scaleRelational380270
Fully managed service, MongoDB compatibility, High availabilityVendor lock-in, Costly at scaleDocument, Distributed7620968650
Highly scalable, Semantic reasoning capabilitiesComplex pricing model, Requires specialized knowledge for setupRDF Stores, Graph179670
NoSQL data store, Fully managed, Flexible and scalableNot suitable for large performance-intensive workloads, Limited querying capabilitiesDistributed, Key-Value7620968650
Enterprise-grade support and features, Open-source based, High compatibility with OracleCan be complex to manage without expertise, More costly than standard open-source PostgreSQL for enterprise featuresRelational6397690
Datomic Logo
  //  
2012
Immutable data, Temporal queriesLicense cost, Limited in-memory footprintDistributed, Document15770
Embedability, High performance, Low overheadLess known in the modern tech stack, Limited communityDocument, Key-Value825720
mSQL Logo
1994
Lightweight, Embedded systemsObsolete compared to current databases, Limited support and featuresRelational, Embedded2350
High performance in object-oriented data storage, Supports complex data modelsComplex setup, High license costObject-Oriented, Distributed00
High scalability, Advanced analytics with embedded machine learningCost, Complex configurationRelational, Analytical133548690
Supports data integration from various sources, User-friendly interface, Strong data preparation and analytics featuresPrimarily tailored for Hadoop ecosystems, Limited query flexibility compared to SQLAnalytical196760
Low Maintenance, Integrated FeaturesAging Technology, Limited AdoptionRelational, Embedded960
Rapid Application Development, User-Friendly InterfaceOutdated Technologies, Limited Community SupportRelational, Document10
PlanetScale Logo
  //  
2018
Serverless, MySQL compatible, Highly scalableSchema changes can be complex, Relatively new to broader marketNewSQL, Distributed1090820
GT.M Logo
1977
High concurrency, Proven technology, Large user base in healthcareLimited support for modern APIs, Steep learning curveHierarchical00
High availability, Strong consistency, ScalabilityVendor lock-in, Limited third-party supportRelational, Distributed131173210
Advanced analytical capabilities, Designed for big data, High concurrencyCost can increase with scaleAnalytical, Relational12982860
Hybrid architecture supporting in-memory and disk storage, Real-time transaction processingLimited global market penetration, Requires specialized knowledge for optimal deploymentRelational, In-Memory8330
NuoDB Logo
2010
Supports distributed SQL databases, Elastic scale-out with ACID complianceNot suitable for write-heavy workloads, Complex configuration for optimal performanceDistributed, NewSQL, Relational10
High performance, Scalable architecture, Supports complex queriesLimited managed cloud options, Proprietary solutionAnalytical, Relational, Distributed59900
SciDB Logo
2011
Array-based data storage, Suitable for scientific data, Strong data integrity featuresNiche market focus, Limited adoptionAnalytical, Distributed5140
Handles large-scale data, Accelerates query performanceResource-intensive, Complex tuning requiredAnalytical, Columnar, Relational97970
High-speed in-memory processing, ACID compliance, Embedded database optionsProprietary technology, Limited community supportIn-Memory, Relational133548690
Cross-platform support, High reliability, Full SQL implementationLower popularity, Limited recent updatesRelational240
High-performance for Java applications, Object-oriented, Easy to use APILimited query language support, Not suitable for non-Java environmentsObject-Oriented37470
R:BASE Logo
1981
Established user base, Stable for legacy systemsOutdated technology, Limited community supportRelational00
High-performance, Embedded database, SQL supportLack of widespread adoption, Limited cloud supportEmbedded, Relational38990
HTAP capabilities, Machine LearningComplex setup, Limited community supportAnalytical, Distributed, Relational3810
Embedded database solution, Easy integration with .NET applicationsLimited scalability, Windows platform dependencyRelational, Embedded00
MultiValue flexibility, Backward compatibilityLegacy system, Limited modern supportMultivalue DBMS1870
High performance, In-memory database technology, Integration capabilitiesLimited market presence, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Relational00
Full-text search, Easy setupFeature limitations, Scaling challengesSearch Engine, Document100970
OpenQM Logo
2004
MultiValue DBMS capabilities, Cost-effectiveNiche market, Smaller communityMultivalue DBMS00
RDFox Logo
2015
Highly performant RDF store, Supports complex reasoningComplex to implement, Limited to RDFRDF Stores, Graph23100
Massively parallel processing, High-performance graph analyticsComplexity in setup, Limited community supportGraph, RDF Stores, Analytical53590
High concurrency, Embedded supportLimited community, Less popular compared to other relational databasesRelational12030
Multi-model database supporting SQL and graphs, Combines relational and graph processingSolid understanding of SQL and graph databases required, Smaller community supportGraph, Relational00
Strong data security, High performanceProprietary system, CostRelational, Embedded825720
Speedb Logo
2021
High-speed operations, NoSQL capabilitiesRelatively new, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Key-Value580
Small footprint, Embedded database capabilitiesLimited scalability, Less popular than major DBMS optionsEmbedded, Relational4940
Ultipa Logo
2018
Real-time graph processing, Advanced graph algorithmsSpecialized use case, ComplexityGraph4260
Flexible architecture, Supports federationLimited maturity, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed17350
CubicWeb Logo
  //  
2008
Semantic web functionalities, Flexible data modeling, Strong community supportComplex learning curve, Limited commercial supportRDF Stores00
Bangdb Logo
2013
High performance, Supports AI and machine learningLimited community support, Less known compared to mainstream databasesKey-Value, Document40700
Unified platform, JavaScript supportLimited community support, Niche use casesDocument, In-Memory0
High-performance analytics, Good for large data setsComplex setup, Steep learning curveAnalytical, Columnar, Distributed2700
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document48020
Acebase Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADocument, NoSQL0
Dydra Logo
2010
RDF data storage, SPARQL query execution, Managed cloud serviceSpecialized use, Limited broader use outside RDFGraph, RDF Stores1540
Siaqodb Logo
  //  
2009
Embedded, Cross-platform, LightweightLimited query capabilities, Smaller community supportEmbedded, Object-Oriented00
High performance, Compression, ScalabilityProprietary, License costAnalytical, Relational00
Graph-based, Schema-lessEmerging technology, Limited documentationDocument, Distributed00
Flexible graph model, Compatibility with HadoopComplex setup, Limited documentationGraph, Distributed0
JasDB Logo
  //  
2012
Flexible data model, JSON supportLimited commercial support, Basic querying capabilitiesDocument, Embedded00
Scalability, High PerformanceLimited Community SupportTime Series, Distributed105390
High-performance, Low-latency, Efficient storage optimizationComplexity in configuration, Limited community supportKey-Value, Columnar0
High concurrency, Real-time processing, Robust storageProprietary system, Higher costDistributed, In-Memory, SQL00
Highly optimized for .NET applications, Object-oriented data storageLimited to .NET environments, Niche use casesObject-Oriented, In-Memory, Distributed1300
Integrates with all Azure services, High scalability, Robust analyticsHigh complexity, Cost, Requires Azure ecosystemAnalytical, Distributed, Relational7231744620
Advanced graph analytics, Proven scalability and reliability, Supports multiple languages like SPARQL and PrologComplex setup and maintenance, Can be expensive for large-scale deploymentsGraph, RDF Stores206120

Overview of Database Applications in Healthcare

In the healthcare industry, the use of databases is fundamentally transforming the way medical professionals store, process, and access information. As patient care demands precision and swift decision-making, databases serve as a backbone for managing vast amounts of medical data. This includes electronic health records (EHRs), laboratory results, imaging archives, billing information, research data, and more.

Databases in healthcare also facilitate interoperability, enabling different healthcare providers to share patient information securely and efficiently. This interoperability is crucial for offering consistent and comprehensive care. Furthermore, healthcare databases support the use of analytics to detect patterns, which can lead to improved patient outcomes and early detection of diseases.

From the hospital setting to private practices and research institutions, databases ensure that critical information is accessible and retrievable in a timely manner. As the industry continues to evolve with technological advancements, the role of optimized and well-managed databases becomes even more vital.

Specific Database Needs and Requirements in Healthcare

The healthcare sector is unique in its data needs due to its critical focus on patient safety, privacy, and the complexity of medical data. Here’s a closer look at the specific requirements for healthcare databases:

Benefits of Optimized Databases in Healthcare

Optimizing databases in the healthcare sector opens up several significant benefits that enhance operational efficiency and improve patient care:

Challenges of Database Management in Healthcare

Managing databases in healthcare is no small feat. Here are some challenges that the industry faces:

Future Trends in Database Use in Healthcare

The future of healthcare databases is shaped by emerging technologies and innovations, promising to further transform the industry:

Conclusion

Databases are the linchpin of modern healthcare systems, supporting everything from routine medical documentation to groundbreaking research. As the industry evolves, the need for robust, secure, and efficient databases continues to grow. Understanding the specific needs and challenges of healthcare databases allows organizations to harness their full potential, ultimately leading to enhanced patient care and operational efficiency. By anticipating future trends and preparing for technological advancements, the healthcare industry can ensure that its database systems remain adaptable, innovative, and primed for the challenges of tomorrow.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost